To: Blood of Tyrants
The $100 machines probably have better odds than 75%, but certainly less than 100%. If the evil one hadn’t been consistently losing money, the hotels wouldn’t have been consistently giving him great comps.
30 posted on
10/05/2017 6:50:14 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(The logical endpoint of "zero-tolerance history" is zero history.)
To: AZLiberty
[My bet is that he has reason to be worried.]
Oh yes, the pun is definitely intended.
32 posted on
10/05/2017 6:54:10 PM PDT by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: AZLiberty
If the evil one hadn’t been consistently losing money, the hotels wouldn’t have been consistently giving him great comps.I'm not sure that's the way it works. They're looking for people who gamble large sums consistently, because the math should eventually favor the house in the long run. Losing small sums consistently to individuals doesn't really harm the casino, because it's great marketing having a guy talk about winning to rubes who aren't necessarily as skilled.
43 posted on
10/05/2017 7:07:00 PM PDT by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: AZLiberty
As someone said, if you bring in $100,000 questionable money and launder it through the slots and walk out with $70,000 in taxable “winnings” on a 1099, the casinos aren’t going to say a word.
103 posted on
10/05/2017 7:53:41 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: AZLiberty
Most machines are set up 60/40 some 55/45. 60 or 55 for the house 40 or 45 for the player. But and this is the key, machines like to pay out big. So if you know when one is about to hit, your odds are very much improved.
105 posted on
10/05/2017 7:55:45 PM PDT by
jpsb
(Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson