Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/28/2017 3:18:17 PM PDT by JP1201
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JP1201

A 12 step protocol? Don’t they have to get convicted before they have to go to AA?


2 posted on 09/28/2017 3:22:20 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

Drug Warrior: So what? They must have done something sometime.


3 posted on 09/28/2017 3:23:04 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

Soon there will be a ‘fingerprint’ drug test, that will detect MJ and cocaine, and many other drugs. No need to draw blood with that test.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 3:29:15 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

And the police wonder why their credibility is rapidly disappearing.


5 posted on 09/28/2017 3:29:16 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201
Bogus Stoned Driving Arrests Highlight Dubious Methods of 'Drug Recognition Experts'

"Reason" magazine is a well known drug legalizing apologetics effort.

Libertarians are always going on about drugs.

6 posted on 09/28/2017 3:31:35 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

Field sobriety tests have always been problematic. They’re pretty hard to pass stone cold sober, especially on the side of the road with the fear of going to jail if you fail. Most places you can decline and skip to the breathalyzer/ blood test, and you should if you can, even if you’re a teetotaler.


8 posted on 09/28/2017 3:35:55 PM PDT by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201
Given that there's nothing resembling a "scientific" way to determine if one's "under the influence" of grass the only two options are to either accept the testimony of cops as fact *or* refrain from prosecuting any such case.

Neither option is very appealing.

9 posted on 09/28/2017 3:39:09 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

We have one of these DRE officers in our jurisdiction. He even testified that the defendant was impaired by marijuana even though the blood test showed nothing. He’s right and the lab was wrong. Although most of the judges don’t believe him, he still has a gun and a badge.


13 posted on 09/28/2017 3:49:47 PM PDT by henkster (The View: A psychiatric group therapy session where the shrink has stepped out of the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JP1201

DRE, another stink pile of turds invented by the pseusdoscience of psychology.


20 posted on 09/28/2017 4:52:09 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson