1 posted on
09/28/2017 3:18:17 PM PDT by
JP1201
To: JP1201
A 12 step protocol? Don’t they have to get convicted before they have to go to AA?
2 posted on
09/28/2017 3:22:20 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
To: JP1201
Drug Warrior: So what? They must have done something sometime.
3 posted on
09/28/2017 3:23:04 PM PDT by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: JP1201
Soon there will be a ‘fingerprint’ drug test, that will detect MJ and cocaine, and many other drugs. No need to draw blood with that test.
4 posted on
09/28/2017 3:29:15 PM PDT by
zipper
(In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist)
To: JP1201
And the police wonder why their credibility is rapidly disappearing.
5 posted on
09/28/2017 3:29:16 PM PDT by
MeganC
(Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
To: JP1201
Bogus Stoned Driving Arrests Highlight Dubious Methods of 'Drug Recognition Experts' "Reason" magazine is a well known drug legalizing apologetics effort.
Libertarians are always going on about drugs.
6 posted on
09/28/2017 3:31:35 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: JP1201
Field sobriety tests have always been problematic. They’re pretty hard to pass stone cold sober, especially on the side of the road with the fear of going to jail if you fail. Most places you can decline and skip to the breathalyzer/ blood test, and you should if you can, even if you’re a teetotaler.
8 posted on
09/28/2017 3:35:55 PM PDT by
discostu
(Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
To: JP1201
Given that there's nothing resembling a "scientific" way to determine if one's "under the influence" of grass the only two options are to either accept the testimony of cops as fact *or* refrain from prosecuting any such case.
Neither option is very appealing.
To: JP1201
We have one of these DRE officers in our jurisdiction. He even testified that the defendant was impaired by marijuana even though the blood test showed nothing. He’s right and the lab was wrong. Although most of the judges don’t believe him, he still has a gun and a badge.
13 posted on
09/28/2017 3:49:47 PM PDT by
henkster
(The View: A psychiatric group therapy session where the shrink has stepped out of the room.)
To: JP1201
DRE, another stink pile of turds invented by the pseusdoscience of psychology.
20 posted on
09/28/2017 4:52:09 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson