Posted on 09/28/2017 3:53:30 AM PDT by cincinnati65
Jill Stein has lashed out at the suggestion that Russian Facebook ads cost Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton the election. The former Green presidential hopeful was backed by at least one Facebook ad bought by Russia ahead of the 2016 election, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump also benefiting from the adverts, a Politico report said.
(Excerpt) Read more at uk.news.yahoo.com ...
"The advert that backed Stein, which did not specifically dismiss Clinton but put across the case for her opponent, read: Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein. Trust me. Its not a wasted vote. The only way to take our country back is to stop voting for the corporations and banks that own us. #GrowASpineVoteJillStein.
Ha! Ha! Ha!
I’m still waiting for the investigation into Hillary’s connection with the Russians, the giving away of our uranium to the Russians, her 30,000 lost emails, her scrubbed hard drives, her hammer-smashed cell phones, etc. I’m waiting, waiting, waiting.....
She needs to look no further than Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio and Pennsylvania to see why she lost. She offered them nothing but democrat doom and gloom and welfare. Trump promised to get the economy moving again and to bring back coal, gas & oil, manufacturing, trade and jobs, jobs, jobs!
“Im still waiting for the investigation into Hillarys connection with the Russians, the giving away of our uranium to the Russians, her 30,000 lost emails, her scrubbed hard drives, her hammer-smashed cell phones, etc. Im waiting, waiting, waiting.....”
And exactly how much Russian money from various sources went to the Clinton Foundation and the quid pro quo promised by the Clintons for that money.
Zuckerberg turned over 3,000 ads to Congress that MIGHT have been paid for by Russians. Wow, 3000 ads that cost $100,000. How many tens of millions of dollars did Clinton spend on ads, and the tens of millions more spent by her super PAC’s. Does anyone with half a brain think that 3,000 ads, some of which started appearing in 2014, really had any impact on the election whatsoever?
Jill Stein would’ve won, but the judge blocked her recount.
Remember that Jill Stein was pushing for a recount in 2016.
She “believed” that the election was “stolen”.
Stalinists lie. Always
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/jill-stein-recount-effort-232192
In 1996 Chinese Communist government money went to the Clinton-Gore campaign (for missile and other technology). When caught and exposed eventually, they paid back the money (making it a glorified loan). No one went to prison.
In 2004 MoveOn.Org ran a contest for the Far Left to make ads against the Bush re-election effort. Entries came in from around the world. They had something like 1500 ads that went online. Only the “winner” was broadcast on television but a lot of “fake news” ads were put ONLINE.
Also SeeBS-Viacommie-MTV broke in repeatedly into MTV programming in 2004 with “news updates” that Bush was “bringing back the draft” (even though the only bills in the House and Senate were entirely authored and sponsored by Democrats).
Wow, 3000 ads that cost $100,000.
$33 an ad? The amount one might spend posting a “free kittens” ad in the classified section of a local paper.
hitlary LOST BECAUSE REAL AMERICAN PEOPLE DO NOT LIKE OR TRUST THE bitch!!!!
Correct. This was a $100,000 campaign, vs how many billions spent by Trump+HRC combined.
Let’s assume — impossibly — that every ad was pro-Trump and/or anti-HRC. If this expenditure of only $100,000 was enough to tip the Presidential election, then I am quite certain that that advertising campaign alone would be the entire course of study for both undergraduate and graduate Marketing Degree programs in the College of Business of every university in the country for the next 200 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.