Posted on 09/24/2017 12:04:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Hillary Clinton, during a recent interview promoting her new book, stated that she would not rule out the possibility of challenging the results of the November 2016 election. One day later, she reversed herself saying, I think no one, including me, is saying we will contest the election.
While Clinton did walk back the statement, to assert something so provocative, get national publicity, and pull it back just a day later hardly excuses a serious error. Given this unprecedented suggestion, judgment needs to be cast on the former secretary of State for how she has conducted herself, what she has said, and ultimately, who she is personally and politically.
I have disagreed with her political stance, and though I disagree vehemently, it is certainly within her right to say that she is a part of the resistance and to blame seemingly everyone but herself for her election defeat. I understand that well.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Soon to be on a book tour with Cindy Sheehan.
She is full of herself.
Strange as it is, the neocons are now in support of Hillary Clinton.
Strange as it is, the neocons are now in support of Hillary Clinton.
The only thing “Witchary” Loves is herself and POWER!
Please don’t insult Cindy Sheehan.
Hillary isn’t American but rather a Neoeuropan
Hillary loves Hillary, booze and lesbian sex, in no particular order.
Wow, am I glad she is not in the WH.
It could be that God still continues to bless America in spite of its wrong choices.
If John McCain ‘truly loves America’, he should support President Trump.
Hillary's commitment is to a cultish movement which she identifies as being "Progressive," when, in fact that movement systematically has been removing and replacing the ideas of liberty, as outlined in America's Declaration of Independence and structured into strictly limited powers for self-government, with the Progressive movement's imposition of expanding government power over people--the very definition of the ideas of tyranny.
Her plan for population control in order for her socialistic goals and Margaret Sanger's abortion methods for achieving that control expose her broader agenda and dedication to that cultish movement.
Hillary Clinton is not qualified to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." As a matter of fact she, even in her defeated position, is a great threat to that Constitution and its underlying ideas of individual liberty.
What neocons?
Well said indeed!
The only things Hillary loves are money, power and herself.
And carpet munching.
Right on cue. :D
Hillary loves Hillary.
Obama hated America and so does Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.