Posted on 09/23/2017 8:21:17 AM PDT by Raymond Pamintuan
Atheism, the rejection of the possibility that “God” exists, has become the dominant thought amongst intellectuals in the past century and has been around longer than most people think. For over 2000 years, it was based on philosophical arguments that can roughly be summed up as the atheist saying, “I don’t know how ‘X’ came to be, but you can’t prove it came from God.” This mindset has been highly effective because it places the burden of proof on the theist to prove the positive of God’s existence, which, superficially, is impossible to do – because no evidence exists that provides “proof” that can be independently verified and repeated at a five-sigma (5σ) confidence level and above that God is real.
During the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th century, atheists were no longer content to use philosophical arguments and started using positive claims that basically said, “‘X’ proves God does not exist.”
Most recently, the highly influential New Atheism spearheaded by Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, and Hitchens has modified the positive arguments, but reinforced and justified a dangerous trend that started in the late 20th century that roughly states, “Because you do not accept that “X” proves God does not exist, you are not credible and must not be allowed to be in a position of influence over others.”
The New Atheism mindset has had an enormous effect among atheists in positions of power in academia: For the “thought crime” of believing God exists, theist scientists have actually been blocked from jobs and tenure, they have been prevented from getting their works funded or published, and many have actually been terminated from their jobs. One now sees university campuses where openly theist professors are becoming rarer by the year,
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Oh?
Just to WHOM must this 'moral' GOD account?
His soul is crying; "Give me Something to believe in!!"
You sound like you were a very good mother. Which makes for lucky children.
>> APL: I don’t have a belief system
Atheism is the presumptuous rejection of another’s intimate faith, not the absence of a personal belief system. The agnostic makes the best argument in this regard.
The assumption that “this stuff has always been here” comes from the idea that a GOD does NOT exist.
This leads to the question “How long has it been here?"
Been there; done that.
We all know that E=mc2 thingy.
We also know it can be rearranged to read
m=E/c2 (Poof! the Big Bang!!)
Now the question that forms is:
Where'd the energy come from?
I’m here because I’m a conservative. That really isn’t synonymous with Christian (as the Catholic church and various left wing religious organizations daily prove.)
I'm afraid you don't quite know what you're talking about there, but you've often come across that way over the years here at FR.
There's nothing to explain. I have no belief system. That's... kind of it.
Well; mine wants all to admit being a sinner.
After that he/she/it wants to let them know that they are Loved.
When that all finally sinks in; He wants all to know that in the future, there will be a really neat place to live in!
And all He asks is, "Believeth thou this?"
Cool!
Exactly :)
I’m just going to disagree and leave it at that. No sense going on with this.
I don’t blame you. If you can’t categorize every observation, surmise, hypothesis, or contemplation as a “belief,” it becomes difficult to reduce every world view to a “belief system.”
>> I’m afraid you don’t quite know what you’re talking about there
The atheist’s axiom.
ib4 “There are no atheists in foxholes” ::-)
I found the easiest way to debate an atheist is to simply ask them if 1) they believe that life could exist elsewhere in the universe, and 2) if they believe other dimensions could exist apart from our own. I have yet to encounter an atheist who would deny those idea. If so, the next logical question is why is it so difficult to believe in angels, demons, or God etc. existing as life in another dimension alongside of us? Invariably that stops the conversation.
It’s not true anyway. 15 months ago I had a near-death experience and all that went through my mind was “so this is it.” Nothing about religion occurred to me till later when I told my Mom about it and ... well, she’s religious, so she started talking about it.
Indeed, for ETs are not seen as making moral demands, apart from things like liberal causes, nor threaten eternal punishments, apart from things like liberal causes. More people have suffered and died due to fornication, primary sodomic, than from nuclear bombs, which threat was the reason for
One can be a conservative without being a Christian, but one cannot be a Christian without being a social conservative, but being a Catholic really is not necessarily synonymous with being a Christian and a conservative.
However, both Christians and Catholics have their respective supreme transcendent standards for faith and morals to which they can be compared to, while for the atheist what seems "reasonable" to each one is the supreme standard, however divergent.
But it is good to see that you support a pro-God forum and America, regardless of seeing proof of God as useless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.