Posted on 09/21/2017 7:33:08 PM PDT by GuavaCheesePuff
MADISON, Wis. (WMTV) -- A UW junior says the clothing line is meant to start conversations about social justice, but many are calling messages on the clothing offensive, especially to law enforcement. Eneale Pickett created the "No Justice" clothing line in response to events such as the protests turn violent in Charlottesville last month.
"Nobody really listens until you take it to the extreme," Pickett said.
Shirts in his clothing line read things like "destroy the city that caused you to bury me," and "(expletive) the police they the biggest gang in Amerikkka."
(Excerpt) Read more at nbc15.com ...
He has every right to do it, it’s free speech, but let him live with the consequences.
He has every right to do it, its free speech, but let him live with the consequences.
Gee, I wonder how many times he will get pulled by an LEO for a minor infraction and get a simple warning!
“Here’s your five tickets sir, please sign them all and read the financial requirements on the back”
” Have a good day Sir...please drive more carefully in the future, I’d don’t want to pull you over again”
Probably make good targets.......
Eneale Pickett calls himself an artist.....I guess if I took a dump on a blank canvas I could call myself an artist too.
“Nobody really listens until you take it to the extreme,” Pickett said. Shirts in his clothing line read things like “destroy the city that caused you to bury me,” and “(expletive) the police they the biggest gang in Amerikkka.”
**************
That kid is urging people to commit crimes of violence. At the very least, the budding thug should be expelled.
Calls for violence have ***NEVER*** been found to be Constitutionally protected speech.
POS wants to be a victim. He lives in a nation that allow him a university education but yet this baby is a poor victim? Poor wambypamby victim. Stupid m{**}*}^%]%*+ doesn’t know how good he has it.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Has to be an “immediate” incitement to violence. A shirt wearer is not doing that. It’s legal
This guy’s a genius. He’s gonna make a fortune.
...if I took a dump on a blank canvas I could call myself an artist too.
Eneale Pickett will be dead soon from natural causes. We should ignore him/her/it until that happens.
No - it isn’t.
But he’ll get away with it because he’s black and he has a feel good PC cause.
No, you are very wrong.
Brandenburg is one of the most important SCOTUS cases in history. Here is a summary.
The Supreme Court has held that “advocacy of the use of force” is unprotected when it is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and is “likely to incite or produce such action”. In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the conviction of a Ku Klux Klan group for “advocating ... violence ... as a means of accomplishing political reform” because their statements at a rally did not express an immediate, or imminent intent to do violence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.