Posted on 09/09/2017 8:57:17 AM PDT by davikkm
Former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano sued the Trump administration to keep the current DACA program in place.
At least 2.1 million illegal alien children in the US are potentially eligible for DACA—with 1.2 million having immediately met the age, education, length of residence, and other criteria when the initiative launched in 2012.
That’s a lot of potential Democrat voters. The Democrat party relies on these newbies to win elections and take the US down the road of ruin.
Napolitano admits in her statement that the University of California, a state run institution, already hires hundreds if not thousands of illegals.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Napolitano wants your money so she can use it to replace you with illegal immigrants who would than take your jobs and vote against your interests. It’s as simple as that.
I thought the number was 6-800,000 ???
theyre multiplying like rabbits...
illegal alien daca rabbits...
First time I ever heard that word used that way.
I'll be we don't hear it used that way again for at least another eight years.
Every last Lawyer that files a lawsuit such as this, should be Immediately DISBARRED!!
The very idea that they do not understand our Separation of Powers and how our Constitution is written, and the premise and use of “Executive Orders” should be not only grounds for Permanent Disbarment, they should be JAILED for COntempt.
“Napolitano admits in her statement that the University of California, a state run institution, already hires hundreds if not thousands of illegals.”
Let’s all sue the Gov., — for enforcing it’s own laws.
What would Rod Serling and his Twilight Zone have to say about this situation? After all, Sering co-wrote; Planet of the Apes. Too bad he’s not around (anymore) to tie this one in, with an all together Political Movie.
WE in the USA are living in very strange days.
That's what I understood. Holy Crap, something smells here. Screw these illegals, kick them all out. Kill DACA and return illegal children including all illegal parents.
The link below is a long one but it gets into the reality of California college kids have been turned down for Opecker Kids, out of state kids, Chinese multi-millionaires and government-subsidized students from myriad other places had a lot to do with their vastly increased numbers at UC, and of course their beloved undocumented citizen kids/faux students.
UCLA admitted just 14.6 percent of California hopefuls this year, even as it became the first American public university to get more than 100,000 admission applications. Berkeley took just 19.7 percent, with out-of-staters eating up many slots that otherwise could go to Californians. As they previously have, UC officials predicted in-state enrollments would actually rise, noting they have longstanding analyses of how many admission offers are acted on by non-Californians.
Whose UC is it? — still a valid question!!!
By THOMAS D. ELIAS | Orange County Register PUBLISHED: August 8, 2017 at 12:02 am | UPDATED: August 8, 2017 at 11:01 am
As a new school year approaches on the nine campuses of the University of California, it’s fair for parents of prospective students to ask once again, as many have for at least the last eight years, whose UC will it be?
The question first arose during the Great Recession that began about nine years ago, a time when UC began accepting more and more out-of-state and foreign students to help make up for funding cuts inflicted by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and state legislators.
Over 12 years, the foreign and out-of-state enrollment at UC — some of whose campuses are routinely listed among the top five public universities in America and the world — rose from 5 percent to more than 21 percent. University administrators were forced to concede the $26,000 in extra tuition paid by the children of Arab oil sheiks and Chinese multi-millionaires and government-subsidized students from myriad other places had a lot to do with their vastly increased numbers at UC.
Meanwhile, the proportion of highly eligible California high school graduates who actually went to UC was falling despite their supposedly being guaranteed a slot somewhere in the university.
About two years ago, administrators began feeling some heat over this, with state legislators threatening to cut the taxpayer contributions to UC coffers unless the trend stopped. So UC regents voted overwhelmingly in late 2015 for a plan to increase in-state enrollment by 5,000 students in each of the next two years, this fall being the plan’s second year.
This action, proposed by UC President Janet Napolitano, amounted to a tacit admission that the critics were correct.
Since then, there has been a bit of a shift toward higher enrollments of Californians at UC. The system announced as it sent out acceptance offers this spring it would have 2,500 more California undergraduates than it did two years ago. Not exactly the 10,000 promised by the university’s governing board back then, but progress nonetheless.
In fact, UC reported that admission offers to Californians declined this year by about 1,200 from last year, a drop of almost 2 percent. Meanwhile, a reported 31,030 non-Californians got admission offers, a jump of about 4 percent from last year.
Justifiable outcries began immediately. “UC officials are tone deaf and insensitive to Californians and the (state’s) master plan for higher education,” said state Sen. Jim Nielsen, R-Roseville. “Californians subsidize UC so that their children may attend and learn to be competitive in this global economy. Instead, UC officials are admitting non-Californians to the detriment of California students.”
What Nielsen said is more true of the primo UC campuses like Berkeley, UCLA, San Diego and Irvine than it is of those at Riverside, Merced and Santa Cruz, which are in somewhat less demand by out-of-staters.
UCLA admitted just 14.6 percent of California hopefuls this year, even as it became the first American public university to get more than 100,000 admission applications. Berkeley took just 19.7 percent, with out-of-staters eating up many slots that otherwise could go to Californians. As they previously have, UC officials predicted in-state enrollments would actually rise, noting they have longstanding analyses of how many admission offers are acted on by non-Californians.
But there are new questions about the reliability of statements from Napolitano and her staff. A state audit, for example, showed the president’s office squirreled away about $175 million over the last few years in a slush fund, at the same time tuition rose by almost the same amount. That led to great mistrust, which many governors would have resolved by firing the perpetrators.
But, as usual with financial chicanery conducted by officials associated with Gov. Jerry Brown, no one was punished and business carried on, following pious pledges to clean up their act from Napolitano and other administrators.
All of which leads parents of prospective UC students to feel betrayed by and untrusting of a system originally created to serve people like their children. Thomas D. Elias is a writer in Southern California.
http://www.ocregister.com/2017/08/08/whose-uc-is-it-still-a-valid-question/
Oh. The Chancellor, not the Judge.
700,000 - 2,100,000- 30,000,000
What’s the difference...
maybe theyre including the illegal alien parents and other illegal alien family members ???
the siblings, grandparents aunts uncles cousins...
what exactly are the grounds for a lawsuit?
“We’re suing Trump because he said he might do something in six months, but didn’t say what he’d do.”
oh and children the illegal alien dacas have had...the average age is 25...lots of them are in their 30s...
What standing does she have?
Well following the precedent of the great state of California and Prop 8 supporters... I’d say her case should be thrown out because she has no standing to sue.
Jinx
heyre multiplying like rabbits...
illegal alien daca rabbits...
LOLOL.... spot on!!
She is the chancellor of the UC system. They have a loot off dreamers. she can support financially a suit to “defend her students” and use our tax money from the university budget to do it. lastly she hid 150 million from the deot of finance and wasn’t fired, so she has a large pot of funds to sue anyone she wants. Sidebar, she was also not fired for letting AntiFA destroy campus buildings and not support the free speech rights of the speakers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.