Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
Since you do not have any actual evidence and they do, I’d say you’re wrong.

Baloney. Judicial Watch has uncovered plenty of "evidence" that would have otherwise been swept under the rug. Sessions is protecting the swamp, which should be upgraded to a cesspool at this point.

226 posted on 09/11/2017 11:36:10 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason (The U.S. Senate - where American freedom goes to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Major Matt Mason

No. Judicial Watch uncovers “evidence” that by itself means nothing in a formal investigation.

Please speak to a prosecutor or DA and get an understanding of what these kinds of cases entail.

Bannon told me flat out that they were not going after most of these people because the evidence wasn’t there and because it was a waste of resources because they couldn’t get convictions in a DC jury.


231 posted on 09/11/2017 4:27:34 PM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson