No. Judicial Watch uncovers “evidence” that by itself means nothing in a formal investigation.
Please speak to a prosecutor or DA and get an understanding of what these kinds of cases entail.
Bannon told me flat out that they were not going after most of these people because the evidence wasn’t there and because it was a waste of resources because they couldn’t get convictions in a DC jury.
Then how does Bannon propose that we "drain the swamp"? It can't be done overnight, of course, but it won't be done at all if people aren't made to pay for their crimes. Nobody likes the IRS other than hardcore Dems - assuming that they couldn't get a conviction in DC seems like they simply bailed on doing so. Sorry, but this decision is not sitting well with a lot of people, not just me.