Posted on 09/07/2017 6:45:45 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant
Data from state police and the secretary of state shows that out-of-staters who don’t live in NH may have determined 2016’s political races.
A voting data request from the Speaker of the House to both the Department of Safety and the Secretary of State has revealed that more than 5,000 people who were allowed to vote in the November 2016 general election probably don’t actually live in the state and also never became drivers or registered vehicles in New Hampshire. In mid-August, Speaker Shawn Jasper, R-Hudson, requested the statistical information in order to assist representatives so they could assess “the effectiveness of our current election laws as well as future legislation that could improve our voter registration and verification processes.” Jasper pointed to both the Help America Vote Act – for new voters – as well as state law that requires state police to match the voter checklist with driving information to ensure accuracy and validity of voter checklists and registered voters.
On Nov. 8, 2016, 6,540 voters used an out-of-state driver’s license as identification to vote, but as of Aug. 30, 2017, only 1,014 of those individuals – 15.5 percent – had been issued a New Hampshire driver’s license, according to the data.
Fraud swung the NH election for Hillary and a Senator.
So Trump really took the state then, eh?
What is the % of Democrats vs Republicans and Independents committing this voter fraud.
Same thing was done in NV, NM, MN and VA.
As it becomes clear that hundreds of thousands to millions voted illegally, they will say that it’s 50-50, so no big deal. Just keep moving the goalposts.
The law in NH is that if you become a resident there, you have 60 days in which to obtain an NH driver license.
For same-day voting with an out of state license, you still have to claim to be a NH resident...and so, if you are really a new NH resident, then, by law, you must have switched driver licenses within 60 days (assuming, of course, that you drive).
People haven’t been doing that. Instead chartered buses are driven from MA with the people (Alt-Left types) dropped off at polling places. They show their MA driver licenses, promise that they are about to become NH residents, and then register and vote - all on Election Day.
Then the buses take them home and they never step foot in NH until 2 years later, for the next election.
Sounds like HUGE VOTER FRAUD going on there...and hopefully Pence makes this front-and-center.
Exclusive – Kobach: It Appears That Out-of-State Voters Changed the Outcome of the New Hampshire
The Left is organized and good at this stuff. If this fraud is not stopped, the Left will do it again, and even bigger next time.
My friends: half the people don’t care. We have to MAKE THEM CARE. You do that by picking a few to throw the book at. Like President Dutarte. He got the drug dealers to PUBLICLY quit the business. I’m not suggesting those tactics bit a big fine and a record as a felon will go a long way. That plus public humiliation.
This will come in handy whenever Democrats claim that Hillary won the popular vote. Here is an example of a state where fraud might have changed the outcome.
Then, after making this statement, I’d suggest that the reason why Democrats don’t want to investigate voter fraud is because they want to hide this kind of criminality. They don’t want to know the truth.
Go after their claim that Hillary won the popular vote.
“If this fraud is not stopped, the Left will do it again, and even bigger next time.”
Yep, that is a HUGE PART of the Democrat play book. Even if the level of fraud is relatively low now, the infrastructure to support MASSIVE FRAUD is in place and can be used by the Democrats once they think the timing is right.
It is the loss of that infrastructure that they really fear.
Voter fraud gives the left a huge advantage. They approach everything with an “ends justify the means” mindset so they’re quite content to steal elections via fraud. For the greater good of course. /s
Plus, the know they have no chance in a fair election because they have no message that resonates with the electorate. And since they absolutely lust for power and control, voter fraud is their tried and true plan B.
Once we finally get a program in place to construct the border wall, it’s time then to turn all our attention to national voter legislation.
Kelly Ayotte lost the Senate seat by less than 750 votes.
actual vote totals NH for President
Clinton 348,526
Trump 345,790
5k or so would have been more than enough to allow H to win.
>>They don’t want to know the truth.<<
They know the truth. They just don’t want to admit the truth, and the national media is complicit in the coverup, refusing to investigate, preferring to report the lie that there is no evidence of voter fraud.
Dems don't want the investigation because it will raise questions and more questions mean more investigations. It will snowball. This story is just the start... I hope.
It only takes about 1000 votes to swing an election in NH.
It happened in Maryland in 1994.
or 2
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.