Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rolling Stone Accidentally Reveals Senator Kirsten Gillibrand as Pander Queen
Newsbusters ^ | September 6, 2017 | P.J. Gladnick

Posted on 09/06/2017 12:57:47 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

As you see in the very title of their paean to junior senator from New York (D-of course), How Kirsten Gillibrand Is Outsmarting Donald Trump, they meant it to be entirely adulatory. However, the article's author, Tessa Stuart, was so blinded in admiration for her subject that she failed to notice that she accidentally revealed Gillibrand's utter duplicity.

Perhaps Stuart was so blinded by Gillibrand's "brilliance" that it allowed a very ugly truth to slip out. Let us first jump in when Stuart was in the process of pouring out love for Gillibrand that kept oozing right up to the moment of the embarrassing revelation:

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: kirstengillibrand; mattressgirl; newyork; panderqueen; rollingstone; tessastuart; tracyflick; worstexcerptever
Maybe we should call her Mattress Senator because she tried to take advantage of the notoriety of Mattress Girl...until she made a porno video and was proven to be lying about her "rape."
1 posted on 09/06/2017 12:57:47 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

DACA is DemoCACA! How about TACO: Trump’s Action for Child Outsiders?


2 posted on 09/06/2017 1:04:24 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Another Demonicrat political whore... in New York...

In other news. grass is green.

3 posted on 09/06/2017 1:07:00 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Gillibrand is a perfect example of why one should never trust a “pro 2nd Amendment”, or “pro life” dem. Their party allows them to posture as such until they need their vote, or in Gillibrand’s case, until she aspired for higher office; at which time they will always do a 180 and renounce their former positions. Remember when Al Gore was considered a “conservative democrat” when he ran against eventual nominee Michael Dukakis in 1988?


4 posted on 09/06/2017 1:10:03 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Democratic colleagues dismissed her as "Tracy Flick." Representing a largely rural upstate district, she was protective of gun rights, opposed amnesty for undocumented immigrants and supported increased funding for border security. But as a senator, she has found her way to more progressive positions – in some cases, complete reversals

She ran for Congress against Incumbent John Sweeney in a conservative district and she had to lie to the voters. She pulled an October surprise when she obtained 911 tapes of Sweeney's then wife (a skank) who was drunk and called 911 to report him for doing nothing. It tanked his bright career, and Silly Gilly walked in. Her Mother was reported to be a girlfriend of a powerful Albany Mayor for Life, she has been given all the help in the world. Unfortunately, she has only air between her ears, no brain cells. She will not amount to much as when she is challenged her ignorance is easily seen.

5 posted on 09/06/2017 1:13:18 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I’m sure she was thoroughly dishonest when she established her former “moderate” credentials. It’s not that her views have changed, it’s that she releases her inner Leftard to push her statewide and national liberal needs. We now see the real Gillibrand.


6 posted on 09/06/2017 1:14:40 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

I picked up copy of Rolling Stone recently; its beyond done as a music rag. Half the mag stories were either hate-Trump, hate Republicans, or democrat party propaganda, such as this story above.


7 posted on 09/06/2017 1:27:39 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

She is saying that she can campaign like Trump and beat him. Rolling Stone is saying that she is capable of telling whatever lies about her positions she needs to get elected.

This will work fine and she will succeed unless she gains her weight back and if she can hold on to her looks till then. If they try to paint her and photograph her as a “serious” candidate, then I am afraid she will not be attractive enough to win. The photo attached to the Rolling Stone article shows she is aging (but the angle shows that at least there is no double chin.)

The stupid swing voters who decide who our president must be, will vote for her if she says what they want to hear and if she is attractive enough. The first is a foregone conclusion, the second is still doubtful.


8 posted on 09/06/2017 1:42:48 PM PDT by BDParrish (One representative for every 30,000 persons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Gillibrand is a Schumer mini-me complete piece of libtard TRASH. I could see her run over by the Long Island Railroad and not lift a hand to help her. She is a cancer to the entire idea of America, strictly devoted to illegals, womens’ non-issues, and other very lightweight stuff. Name me ONE significant piece of pro-America legislation which came from her. You can’t.


9 posted on 09/06/2017 4:06:39 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson