The publisher will take a bath on this as well they should. The leftie liberals in the United Methodist Church will however continue to kiss the Democrats’ @SS.
My favorite comment:
Warren
2 hours ago
Hillary is going to come back in 2020 to finish off what is left of the Democratic Party.
Fake candidate, fake pastor
The church of the almighty secularist.
Say no more. That right there says it all.
October 11, 1991
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/11/us/boston-u-panel-finds-plagiarism-by-dr-king.html
BOSTON, Oct. 10 A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University concluded today that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized passages in his dissertation for a doctoral degree at the university 36 years ago.
"There is no question," the committee said in a report to the university's provost, "but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation by appropriating material from sources not explicitly credited in notes, or mistakenly credited, or credited generally and at some distance in the text from a close paraphrase or verbatim quotation." Despite its finding, the committee said that "no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action that the panel said would serve no purpose.
But the committee did recommend that a letter stating its finding be placed with the official copy of Dr. King's dissertation in the university's library.
The four-member committee was appointed by the university a year ago to determine whether plagiarism charges against Dr. King that had recently surfaced were in fact true. Today the university's provost, Jon Westling, accepted the committee's recommendations and said its members had "conducted the investigation with scholarly thoroughness, scrupulous attention to detail and a determination not to be influenced by non-scholarly consideration."
The dissertation at issue is "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman." Dr. King wrote it in 1955 as part of his requirements for a doctor of philosophy degree, which he subsequently received from the university's Division of Religious and Theological Studies.
One member of the investigating committee, John Cartwright, the university's Martin Luther King Professor of Social Ethics, said the panel had refrained from speculating about the reasons why Dr. King had not properly attributed material, which came from a variety of other interpreters of the works of Tillich and Wieman.
Was it a Satanic church?
Comments were interesting. And yet the maniac continues to try to promote herself as some sort of saint/victim.
She is sickening.
I wonder what he does on Sunday morning.
Crooks of a feather...
"Before writing this book for Hillary, I wrote large portions of the 'Gospel Of Luke'. (Ask newsman Brian Williams. He was there, and witnessed me writing it.)" |
Really? That sounds like the publisher went to the church and ripped the book out of the pastor's hands. Much better would have been:
Pastor's Hillary Clinton book pulled by publisher
I'm sick of these illiterate headline writers.
OOOOOPPSSSS.... lots of problems around this Shrillary clown.
Frauds of a feather flock together.