Posted on 09/05/2017 8:00:55 AM PDT by TigerClaws
Just a few days after announcing the British transgender DJ and activist Munroe Bergdorf as one of the faces of a new campaign championing diversity, today, September 1, LOréal have ended their partnership with her. The announcement follows the U.K. right-wing media's unearthing of a social media post from Bergdorf in which she called out racism and white supremacy.
LOréal's campaign launched on August 27, when the beauty corporation uploaded a glossy YouTube video advertisement for True Match, a range of foundation that promises to match 98% of U.K. skin tones. True Match is the conglomerates marquee fall campaign in Britain, and the brand recruited 23 inspirational individuals as spokesmodels to promote the makeup range. An inclusive range of British personalities were featured, from radio DJ Clara Amfo and pop singer Cheryl Cole, to British Indian model Neelam Gill, and beauty YouTuber Amena Khan. Bergdorf was the only trans woman featured. As well as the main campaign video, LOréal also produced short individual clips for each person featured. In Bergdorfs which was removed from YouTube on the morning of September 1 she appeared dressed in a simple T-shirt and jeans, which accentuated her creamy skin tone and long blonde braids. Over a tinkling piano soundtrack, she said: Its great that LOréal are doing this now, because diversity is hugely important to me. I mean, its why I continue to...do my bit to break down barriers. In an Instagram teaser, LOréal appeared to encourage this kind of self-expression, with a slogan that read: 28 shades, 28 stories. Write yours.
After the campaigns launch, the U.K. right-wing tabloid Daily Mail which regularly gives platform to racist and transphobic hate-speech did some digging on Bergdorf. With barely contained glee, the newspaper published an article on August 31 (which we wont link to here), detailing a Facebook post that Bergdorf made in the wake of the Charlottesville white supremacist rally this August. Bergdorf since deleted the post, but its been widely circulated on Twitter, and is quoted below in full:
"Honestly I don't have energy to talk about the racial violence of white people any more. Yes ALL white people.
Because most of yall dont even realise or refuse to acknowledge that your existence, privilege and success as a race is built on the backs, blood and death of people of colour. Your entire existence is drenched in racism. From micro-aggressions to terrorism, you guys built the blueprint for this s***. Come see me when you realise that racism isnt learned, its inherited and consciously or unconsciously passed down through privilege. Once white people begin to admit that their race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on Earth then we can talk.
Until then stay acting shocked about how the world continues to stay f***** at the hands of your ancestors and your heads that remain buried in the sand with hands over your ears."
Bergdorf delivered some home truths that some may have found hard to hear. But her statement was right on the money. Regardless, in the wake of the Daily Mail article which ran with their headline LOréal transgender model says all white people are racist the brand took swift action and terminated their partnership with Bergdorf. On the morning of September 1, the brand tweeted: LOréal champions diversity. Comments by Munroe Bergdorf are at odds with our values and so we have decided to end our partnership with her. Outrage on Twitter to LOréals decision came quickly:
In a statement to gal-dem on September 1, Bergdorf eloquently spoke about her rightful outrage at LOréals decision, and reasserted that her Facebook post was addressing systemic white supremacy. She wrote: If you truly want equality and diversity, you need to actively work to dismantle the source of what created this discrimination and division in the first place. You cannot just simply cash in because youve realised theres a hole in the market and that there is money to be made from people of colour who have darker skin tones.
Bergorf is right its certainly in LOréals economic interest to provide makeup that works for a range of skin tones according to a Nielsen study, quoted in Refinery 29, black women in the U.S. spend 80% more on cosmetics than their non-black counterparts. Bergdorfs inclusion in the True Match campaign also looked to be a step in the right direction for beauty brands, in the wake of model Andreja Pejić making history in 2015 as the first trans woman to front a major cosmetics campaign. But LOréals knee-jerk dismissal of Bergdorf reveals a darker truth about the companys attitude: that they prefer their spokesmodels to sit still and look pretty, and they have little interest in engaging with the complexity of how trans POC lives are lived. LOréals spineless actions and clear pandering to Britain's right-wing media is an especially grave issue when you consider the violence that persists against of trans women of color, and the overall lack of media representation for this community.
Going forward, Bergdorf will doubtlessly continue to thrive in her career. But in the wake of their decision, the question is whether QTPOC and LGBTQ consumers can ever trust LOréal again. Until the brand corrects its course and takes meaningful steps to remedy its actions, we should do as Bergdorf suggests, and boycott LOréal.
Racist fake female insults customer base of company. Backlash.
Company fires dude. Backlash.
A warning sign to other companies: Avoid virtue signaling to a tiny minority or you'll risk losing the actual people paying for your products.
Note: Title was too long to add the "BARF" to it. Limited to 100 characters on FR.
Well that tears it. I’m switching make up now. Oh. Never mind.
Ha!
It was a FR member who helped me through these pronoun switching stories.
Whenever you see “transgender” substitute the word “fake.”
So “transgender girl” = “fake girl” = has penis (mutilated or not) and male chromosomes.
Guess this business thinks there are more White womencustomers than Black fake women customers. Imagine that.
Oh the pity of it all......
Unfortunately, it doesn't cover up your XY chromosomes.
‘It’ proclaimed that all whites are racist. If an employee of L’Oreal claimed all black people are thugs and was subsequently fired, would this author feel that that would be unacceptable?
It’s unacceptable that they would hire a “trans” model.
I for one, am perfectly fine the tranny racist being fired and shamed.
OK, I’m buying L’Oreal!
“Bergdorf eloquently spoke”
Yes, he/she cussed endlessly.
Never mind the other hateful, vitriolic words she used.
B,b,b, but I thought they liked social justice!
“A warning sign to other companies: Avoid virtue signaling to a tiny minority or you’ll risk losing the actual people paying for your products.”
Totally agree. I spent the weekend being assaulted and insulted by the Adidas “make my own waves” commercial that was a giant sloppy wet kiss of leftist virtue signaling. I’ve spent my last dime in Adidas products.
It’s pretty acceptable to me they fired her.
I remember when firing up and driving a “Black Trans” was cool. Where’s Smokey and the Bandit when you need ‘em?!
So, if you don’t like it, don’t buy their stuff!
An article about this person indicates that they were hired as the face of True Match, a campaign that marries makeup to social justice.
Im trying to figure out why I would want somebody elses SJW politics involved in my cosmetic purchases.
There are lots of nice little makeup companies that dont wallow in this stuff or pander this way.
My eye shadow is by Pennzoil, my lip color is by Chapped, my blush is by Desert Sun, black nail color is by Ball Peen Hammer, and my hair color is grey, by Father Time.
Good. We can decide on our own how to respond to an article.
My wife (Vietnamese)stopped buying L’Oreal products when they hired the trans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.