Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2017 7:11:24 AM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SandRat

It does seem to me, that the whole purpose of PARDON, was to remove the red tape, and declare him innocent.


2 posted on 09/01/2017 7:14:27 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

I thought he was already pardoned. Is this “Pardon” basically a free Get Out of Jail card to be used if needed?


3 posted on 09/01/2017 7:15:12 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Time to jerk the chains on the Ninth Circus....
<><><>or should it be the other way around.


4 posted on 09/01/2017 7:16:30 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
There's been a lot of confusion over what is actually happening here.

President Trump's pardon was issued while there was already a motion in place by Arpaio's legal team to overturn his conviction. The pardon seemingly made this whole legal process moot, but in fact Arpaio's legal team is working on a strategy to make the pardon moot (for the reasons they've outlined here).

What makes this so bizarre is that the judge has ordered the U.S. Justice Department -- who prosecuted the original case against Arpaio -- to file a response to Arpaio's motion to overturn his conviction. How the hell are they supposed to respond here? LOL.

If I were a DOJ lawyer working on this case, I'd be tempted to give up my legal career and get into something more honorable and useful ... like selling heroin.

6 posted on 09/01/2017 7:21:04 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

“Ducey said supporting the pardon did not mean he does not support Latino rights. “

What are, EXACTLY, Latino rights?????


7 posted on 09/01/2017 7:23:11 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
Arizona is still under the gun from Erick Holder & Obama trying to let illegals in regardless of the law...where many of those illegals are is anyone's guess, certainly not the problem of ex-holder and ex-Obama.

McCain and Flake are both wrong and mendacious in their assessment of Sheriff Joe...McCain's vendetta, almost juvenile one-sided feud with POTUS is a disgraceful picture for the nation and Arizona....Flake, as usual, follows the sr. senator.

8 posted on 09/01/2017 7:23:47 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
Hello McFly

PRESIDENTIAL PARDON..... Think!!

10 posted on 09/01/2017 7:24:23 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Uh, pardone moi. WTH? Is the pardon a done deal? If so, then Sessions needs to tell the judge to take a hike. And I don’t even play a lawyer on TV.


11 posted on 09/01/2017 7:29:18 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

If they proceed, he should just give them the finger and not show up or send any representation whatsoever to whatever stupid liberal proceedings they want to engage in.

LOL, what are they going to do?


14 posted on 09/01/2017 7:40:06 AM PDT by rlmorel (Those who sit on the picket fence are impaled by it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

When profiling involves more attributes than just race I would say the closer you a complete picture of an illegal, then racism becomes a remote possibility.


20 posted on 09/01/2017 8:17:46 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

The “profiling” thing is a lie. People were pulled over for a traffic infraction. If during the investigation nobody has ID and nobody speaks English, gee what could it mean? That’s when they’re taken in for likely being an illegal alien.


22 posted on 09/01/2017 8:37:10 AM PDT by Ray76 (Republicans are a Democrat party front group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

This dimwit commie judge does not realize that it does not matter if the contempt is set aside or not.

NOBODY ON EARTH has the power or authority to take the Sheriff into custody or to jail him for this old judicial holding.

And absolutely nobody will try.

Stupid judge engaged in commie masturbation.


25 posted on 09/01/2017 8:41:26 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat
for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona

Jesus. This guy is supposedly a "republican" and a "conservative"?

Unbelievable. The non-crime of profiling was concocted to prevent apprehension.

26 posted on 09/01/2017 8:53:07 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

This crazy judge will NOT let this go.


28 posted on 09/01/2017 8:58:19 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Gyrations to keep the “bad boy” words in permanent records - make them feel good in their frustration and have no real affect on him.


29 posted on 09/01/2017 9:04:19 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat; LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; ...

Ping to the following nuances in the Sheriff Arpaio pardon case revealed in the posted article:

(begin quotes)

More to the point, they said the conviction remains on Arpaio’s record, pardon or not. And while Arpaio cannot be punished for what Bolton found him guilty of in this case, they said that conviction could have repercussions down the road.

For example, they cited court rulings that said this conviction could be used against him at the time of sentencing if he is ever found guilty of any other crime. That could result in a stiffer sentence.

And they said that the conviction, even for a misdemeanor, could be used to argue to a judge or jury in a future case that the sheriff’s testimony was not credible.

Arpaio’s attorneys also suggested that if Bolton refuses to budge they may appeal his conviction anyway to clear his name, something they said would be “a waste of everyone’s time and money.’’

(end quotes)


34 posted on 09/01/2017 9:26:43 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Why are so many judges lunatics?


36 posted on 09/01/2017 9:41:39 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Politically motivated waste of time and resources meant to drag this out to damage the Sheriff and President Trump.

They should have it wrapped up by November 2018 or 2020.


38 posted on 09/01/2017 9:52:27 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

Do it and drop the charges.


40 posted on 09/01/2017 10:10:51 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SandRat

This is a legal hair-splitting exercise. Do you want to vacate the ruling, or let it stand and have Trump’s pardon take effect? Either way, Sheriff Joe walks.

She will likely not set aside the verdict as that outcome is more pleasing to the media, who will fete and celebrate her.


41 posted on 09/01/2017 10:57:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson