Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge to hear arguments regarding Sheriff Joe Arpaio in October
SierraVista Herald ^ | Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services

Posted on 09/01/2017 7:11:24 AM PDT by SandRat

PHOENIX — A federal judge will hear arguments in October over whether she should set aside the criminal contempt of court conviction of Joe Arpaio.

In a brief order late Tuesday, Judge Susan Bolton vacated the scheduled Oct. 5 sentencing of the former Maricopa County sheriff. That followed last week's pardon issued by President Trump.

But Bolton, who found the sheriff guilty of ignoring an order by fellow Judge Murray Snow, put off a separate bid filed by Arpaio's lawyers on Monday to overturn her finding of guilt, a move that would legally wipe out any legal record he had ever been convicted in the first place. Bolton said she wants to hear from federal prosecutors at a hearing on Oct. 4.

The president's pardon eliminated any possibility that Arpaio, facing a possible six months in jail, will actually do any time.

That, however, is not enough to satisfy the former sheriff who continues to insist he did not ignore orders by Snow, hearing a separate civil case, to stop trying to enforce federal immigration laws against people his deputies suspect were in this country illegally. Bolton, who heard the criminal contempt charge, disagreed, saying Arpaio's nearly two dozen public statements saying he would continue to do things his way, showed a "flagrant disregard'' for Snow's order.

In seeking to have the conviction voided, Arpaio's attorneys said the former sheriff never actually asked for the presidential pardon.

More to the point, they said the conviction remains on Arpaio's record, pardon or not. And while Arpaio cannot be punished for what Bolton found him guilty of in this case, they said that conviction could have repercussions down the road.

For example, they cited court rulings that said this conviction could be used against him at the time of sentencing if he is ever found guilty of any other crime. That could result in a stiffer sentence.

And they said that the conviction, even for a misdemeanor, could be used to argue to a judge or jury in a future case that the sheriff's testimony was not credible.

Arpaio's attorneys also suggested that if Bolton refuses to budge they may appeal his conviction anyway to clear his name, something they said would be "a waste of everyone's time and money.''

Tuesday's court development came as Gov. Doug Ducey defended his support for the pardon and bristled at the idea that his position could be seen as offensive to the state's Latino community, many of whom were victimized by the sheriff's immigration raids.

On the heels of the pardon, the governor said Arpaio "deserves credit for helping to reduce crime in Maricopa County over his long career.'' And Ducey said the pardon "brought finality to this chapter in Arizona's history'' and allowed the sheriff and his wife to "move on and enjoy their retirement together.''

That was in sharp contrast to a statement by U.S. Sen. John McCain who said the pardon undermines Trump's claim for respect of rule of law.

"Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge's order,'' McCain said. And the senator said Arpaio "has shown no remorse for his actions.''

Sen. Jeff Flake, for his part, said he would have preferred for Trump to "honor the judicial process and let it take its course.''

Ducey said supporting the pardon did not mean he does not support Latino rights.

"Everything we've done in our administration is standing up for all of the citizens of Arizona,'' the governor said, saying his administration "has been about opportunity for all'' in things like creating jobs or supporting the ability of parents to use tax dollars to send their children to whatever school they want, including private and parochial schools.''


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; bolton; contemp; disreard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: alloysteel

Left Wingers, ... well,... they make up rules, ... that further their stupid agenda.


21 posted on 09/01/2017 8:29:51 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

The “profiling” thing is a lie. People were pulled over for a traffic infraction. If during the investigation nobody has ID and nobody speaks English, gee what could it mean? That’s when they’re taken in for likely being an illegal alien.


22 posted on 09/01/2017 8:37:10 AM PDT by Ray76 (Republicans are a Democrat party front group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

LOL!


23 posted on 09/01/2017 8:38:42 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

sometimes dyslexia can be a blessing   :)


24 posted on 09/01/2017 8:41:18 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This dimwit commie judge does not realize that it does not matter if the contempt is set aside or not.

NOBODY ON EARTH has the power or authority to take the Sheriff into custody or to jail him for this old judicial holding.

And absolutely nobody will try.

Stupid judge engaged in commie masturbation.


25 posted on 09/01/2017 8:41:26 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona

Jesus. This guy is supposedly a "republican" and a "conservative"?

Unbelievable. The non-crime of profiling was concocted to prevent apprehension.

26 posted on 09/01/2017 8:53:07 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
You didn't read the article, did you?

Why would Arpaio refuse to show up or refuse to send any legal representation to a court hearing to address a matter that was filed by HIS lawyers on HIS behalf?

27 posted on 09/01/2017 8:54:15 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

This crazy judge will NOT let this go.


28 posted on 09/01/2017 8:58:19 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Gyrations to keep the “bad boy” words in permanent records - make them feel good in their frustration and have no real affect on him.


29 posted on 09/01/2017 9:04:19 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman
I don’t believe it makes him innocent. It makes him forgiven.

Depends on how you look at that. A pardon removes the conviction from his record.
30 posted on 09/01/2017 9:15:17 AM PDT by JamesP81 (The DNC poses a greater threat to my liberty than terrorists, China, and Russia. Combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

A pardon is not innocence


31 posted on 09/01/2017 9:17:00 AM PDT by wardaddy (Virtue signalers should be shot on sight...conservative ones racked and hanged then fed to dogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

We are in agreement.


32 posted on 09/01/2017 9:17:53 AM PDT by robroys woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

And the bottom line is that it makes the Judges actions irrelevant and mainly just theater.


33 posted on 09/01/2017 9:18:49 AM PDT by robroys woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; ...

Ping to the following nuances in the Sheriff Arpaio pardon case revealed in the posted article:

(begin quotes)

More to the point, they said the conviction remains on Arpaio’s record, pardon or not. And while Arpaio cannot be punished for what Bolton found him guilty of in this case, they said that conviction could have repercussions down the road.

For example, they cited court rulings that said this conviction could be used against him at the time of sentencing if he is ever found guilty of any other crime. That could result in a stiffer sentence.

And they said that the conviction, even for a misdemeanor, could be used to argue to a judge or jury in a future case that the sheriff’s testimony was not credible.

Arpaio’s attorneys also suggested that if Bolton refuses to budge they may appeal his conviction anyway to clear his name, something they said would be “a waste of everyone’s time and money.’’

(end quotes)


34 posted on 09/01/2017 9:26:43 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
John McCain is an enemy of the State - every state. He should be hung before he dies of brain cancer. The contempt he has for the American people and the citizens of Arizona is beyond the pale. His race baiting virtue signaling buck the trend so celebrated is nothing more then numerous knives in the back.

Traitor John McCain - he has shamed his entire family and their legacy. When he is gone and can't protect his name John McCain and Benedict Arnold will often be mentioned in the same breath once we are done exposing the evil this deamon has helped accomplish.

35 posted on 09/01/2017 9:39:17 AM PDT by datricker (Why are Trump lawyers on TV and not Hillary's - Lock her up! Lock her up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Why are so many judges lunatics?


36 posted on 09/01/2017 9:41:39 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

They got liberal coller3 edUMACATIONS.


37 posted on 09/01/2017 9:50:17 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Politically motivated waste of time and resources meant to drag this out to damage the Sheriff and President Trump.

They should have it wrapped up by November 2018 or 2020.


38 posted on 09/01/2017 9:52:27 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

They got liberal college edUMACATIONS.


39 posted on 09/01/2017 10:03:01 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Do it and drop the charges.


40 posted on 09/01/2017 10:10:51 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Be Nice To Your Kids. They Will Pick Out Your Nursing Home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson