To: sukhoi-30mki
2 posted on
08/27/2017 8:05:54 PM PDT by
Charles Martel
(Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
3 posted on
08/27/2017 8:07:18 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
6 posted on
08/27/2017 8:10:23 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: sukhoi-30mki
All well and good, but unless you find a way to trap all noise emissions within the hull, it doesn’t really accomplish much does it?
7 posted on
08/27/2017 8:10:53 PM PDT by
txnativegop
(Socialism -- an evil created by ignorant a-holes!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
8 posted on
08/27/2017 8:13:51 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Old ground pounder here so I really don’t know enough to comment on the future of the world’s navies. However, I honesty doubt that the Royal Navy will be the leader of the pack.
10 posted on
08/27/2017 8:30:23 PM PDT by
11Bush
To: sukhoi-30mki
Pure science fiction.
The UK will not have a navy in the future, all monies will go to social programs and muslims.
20 posted on
08/27/2017 10:38:53 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Sorry, the US has the new COLUMBIA Class (SSBN-826) submarine as a mothership until about 2080. Should be operational in 2031.
21 posted on
08/27/2017 11:03:50 PM PDT by
Thrownatbirth
(.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Royal Navy has what 50 active boats. They couldn’t afford to build an exotic system.
26 posted on
08/28/2017 4:14:49 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
"...the Navy of the future might be sailing in..." A Belladonic haze?
30 posted on
08/28/2017 6:13:08 AM PDT by
HangThemHigh
(Entropy is not what it used to be.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
