Posted on 08/26/2017 5:27:17 AM PDT by TigerClaws
If running and maintaining an NFL stadium was a profitable venture, the teams would insist on building and operating the stadiums themselves.
I would rather watch replays of great past games than watch just about any current game.
Maybe the public could be paid back in rights to download videos of past games.
I assume no federal dollars are going to these stadiums.
The local governments should get tough and demand they be paid back (long term loan) for their stadiums.
In any case, respect for the taxpapers and national anthem should part of the contract. They lose their license to use the stadium if they violate that.
The public needs to get tough with these wealthy athletes and owners living off the public trough.
The ONLY thing L.A. ever did consistently and correctly was not only refuse to tax for NFL teams but to insist the NFL pay for the privilege.
It took a long time but LA got its 2 originating teams back (the Chargers started in L.A.). And no tax $$ from the taxpayers, based on everything I could find.
Too bad I don’t live there anymore — I went to a few Rams games back when (as well as some Raiders games).
I'm sick of the "it's good for the economy" argument. What's good for the economy is for governments to do what they're supposed to do and leave everything else to private enterprise.
San Diego lost all my respect when they took Jack Murphy off the stadium way.
Before Murphy, SD was a sports backwater. He almost single-handedly built pro sports there.
It is fitting it become a sports backwater again for that massive insult to their own history and a man who loved SD much more than it loved him.
Actually since the Qualcomm naming rites has expired, the stadium is being called Jack Murphy Stadium again.
>>Actually since the Qualcomm naming rites has expired, the stadium is being called Jack Murphy Stadium again.<<
Has that happened or is it planned?
Either way it was still an insult.
No business should get tax payer incentives. None.
Wrong as rain tax payer incentives are good to use if the taxpayers gotto vote on there use. My city uses them to a good degree it has made my city the home of many aerospace repair companies and we have no airport its in 2 other cities so there is good use age when the city fathers use it to garner more jobs for the locals......
Must agree. There is no reason the American taxpayer should be subsidizing football stadiums. Just think of the many areas of business where is a real NEED for their products & services & that are not being subsidized. The NFL can stand on their own or fall on their own & it has no business being subsidized.
I have always been vehemently against taxpayer subsidies for stadiums and sports.
Now, even more so.
major league football
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.