Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Members on Pence Detail Reassigned for Bringing Women to Hotel
NBC News ^ | Aug. 24, 2017, 7:15 p.m | Courtney Kube

Posted on 08/25/2017 6:20:35 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 last
To: MayflowerMadam

only a big thing to some......................no biggy...

all have at least some opinion...


141 posted on 08/25/2017 11:01:08 AM PDT by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
Nobody is saying that Jesus was endorsing sin. He is willing to forgive, unlike you, obviously. I see here a bunch of sanctimonious prigs who probably never left their mother's basements. Risky behavior goes along with being willing to takes risks, and we need those imperfect persons to take those chances and put their lives on the line.

In addition, there are a lot of uncertainties in this story. These weren't SS agents, these were military people. We don't know that they were married, you are just assuming. We don't know the women were prostitutes, you were just assuming. We don't know that sexual activity occurred, you are just making assumptions. Why don't you save your sanctimonious Bull$!t until you know the facts. The article didn't even get the country right initially! Lots of servicemen marry decent women they meet in foreign countries, and lots of these women make decent wives. I find your posts offensive and racist in the extreme.

142 posted on 08/25/2017 11:10:25 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

When one acts like an animal....

I did not disrespect their military service. That’s a separate issue


143 posted on 08/25/2017 12:31:58 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I don’t give a fig about you

We are talking about this specific case

The were assigned to protect the VP. They snuck women in. That tells me that they ain’t looking for someone to take home to mom


144 posted on 08/25/2017 12:33:48 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I just have to ask you if you are a U.S. citizen living somewhere else or are you a citizen of another country? I ask because you seem to have an odd edge to comments you make about the U.S. over many topics. Pretty judgemental, edgy.

I disagree about people with high moral standard not having an interest in serving in the military for that reason alone. I know many that do serve and have served. The military is not all miscreants. There are of course many excuses for not serving in the military but those I know who have served who do have high morals have managed to do just fine.


145 posted on 08/25/2017 12:52:06 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

You said they were married. Have you shown that?
You said women who go to where the men were quartered are prostitutes. Have you shown that?

Those two things are what I called you on.

Since (from the very beginning) pretty much everyone here has agreed that they should not have had unauthorized women in their rooms you don’t have anyone to argue with on that point. Nobody disagreed.

So let’s go back to you calling the women prostitutes and insisting the men were married and cheating on families back home.

You do know that this issue is going to come back to you in the future right? You have asserted that women who stray are outright prostitutes and without any evidence to back that up you have defended that assertion for hours with no retraction and no admission that making stuff up like that is morally wrong.

Absolutely you will get many chances to defend this position in the future.


146 posted on 08/25/2017 12:53:21 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

I am a U.S. citizen, for whatever that’s worth.


147 posted on 08/25/2017 12:54:53 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It should mean a lot.


148 posted on 08/25/2017 1:13:42 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

Do you actually read anything you post?

Yes I have.


149 posted on 08/25/2017 1:16:35 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

I didn’t say they were married


150 posted on 08/25/2017 1:17:34 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

You want to act like a boy from the hood or any other immature teen age who hasn’t been taught better then go right ahead

Sex outside of marriage is a sin


151 posted on 08/25/2017 1:19:07 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

So it would be better if they were spies?

Obviously logic and deduction are not your strong suit


152 posted on 08/25/2017 1:24:00 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Nobody said it was good that women were or were not spies.

You insisted that men who had women in their rooms were cheating on their wives. Absent any information that the men were married or even had been married.

You indicate you make this spurious claim because you practice Christian morality.

You have stated outright that women who would go to a military man’s quarters are prostitutes.

You have provided no evidence that the women in question were getting paid. Just being there seems to justify the charge and again you insist you are making this spurious claim in the spirit of godly morality.

You are merely sanctimonious and you seem to believe the scriptures about bearing false witness only apply to other people.


153 posted on 08/25/2017 2:26:23 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

You seem to think that senior officers sneaking women into a secured area means they have good intentions

My life experience tells me otherwise


154 posted on 08/25/2017 2:46:39 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: binreadin

“He is willing to forgive, unlike you, obviously.”

I stopped reading your screed here since nothing I posted implied this. Have a nice day.


155 posted on 08/25/2017 2:51:45 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Zero people on this thread said that the men had good intentions.

People have said that there is has been no information released indicating that A. The men had wives or B. The women were being paid.

Sometimes human beings act like rabbits. Exagerating the story isn’t godly. When you make stuff up and add it to the story don’t claim God wanted you to make that stuff up.


156 posted on 08/25/2017 2:56:31 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: binreadin; TalonDJ; All
"Go to hell you sanctimonious creep."

Oh my, must have struck a raw nerve! Wonder what skeletons are lurking in your closet that you are so offended by attempts to defend traditional morality?

Too bad you were too cowardly to post your despicable hateful response in the forum for all to see, but delivered it via a private message to me.

As for going to hell, I'm afraid you are much more at risk of that than I, for it is written: "Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil." You are attacking those attempting to defend God's commandments, revealing that your description of yourself as "Seeking only the truth..." is nothing more than a farce.

Enough of your sanctimonious - yeah, the term applies to you, not those who dare to contradict you - pretension that the only warriors worthy of the name are those who engage in unrestrained sexual immorality. Many veterans on this forum would take issue with you.

157 posted on 08/25/2017 4:31:48 PM PDT by tjd1454
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: ManHunter
I tried to settle with X from the beginning. I basically offered her everything so I could get on with my life, she refused.

The judge in my case started out saying he was not there to harm anyone. When he came to my case he said “No children, pensions are not an issue, why are you here?” I agreed with him but again she would not settle.

The two things that I smile about are that she got less than I offered her, and her son, my stepson is my buddy. When I go to the US I stay with him. He almost married a girl that had a daughter, he said he tried to treat the daughter like I treated him.

158 posted on 08/25/2017 5:26:55 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Trump the anti politician. About time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

The idea that a “drunken screw” is every soldiers right is not only immoral it violates all sorts of regulations>>>>>>

I did not see anyting about drunken screw in the article, but then, I guess you know more than I do about things like that.

In any event. Americans are free. If they want to violate their marriage vows without breaching their service duties, who cares? That’s between the soldier and whoever. None of my business, or the governments particularly.

That’s why they were not court marshaled, but re-assigned by the little old ladies in charge of the Pense knitting security club.

Americans should not date foreign women, who know how to still be women, unlike the American version of anorexic genetically challenged flappers./S

Hardly worthy of a headline.I am all for our soldiers marrying abroad.They get a far better deal.


159 posted on 08/27/2017 3:55:54 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama Fascism http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

This issue has nothing to do with marriage views. It has everything to do with national security — on many levels.


160 posted on 08/27/2017 4:00:34 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("Negative people make healthy people sick." - Roger Ailes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson