Posted on 08/23/2017 9:27:13 AM PDT by Ohioan
As "wise men" once understood that the sun revolved around the earth, a new business "elite" have come to understand inherent "bigotry" & "discrimination" in such once widely accepted personal classifications, as those by sex, ethnicity, race, age & common sense. With a staccato uniformity, we hear an endless iteration of the chant that such concepts have no place in the personnel management of an aspiring corporation.
Aspirants are not content, only to show enthusiasm in rejecting "bigotry" in classifying humans. It has become, increasingly, a competition to act proactively; to condition personnel to recognize & reject efforts to consider data from which one, not well conditioned, could possibly conclude that such involuntary factors as sex, ethnicity, race, age or common sense, might actually have a connection to achievement levels, based on different specific aptitudes.
(Excerpt) Read more at truthbasedlogic.com ...
At the risk of Google being “unable to find” my Conservative Resource Center in the future, I felt that this required calling them out.
Google reflects the current generation the 'hysterical', madness, irrationality and fear of what are indisputably the facts....intolerance of truth.
Antifa, BLM, Media, professors and universities, grade school dictum/indoctrination of collective obedience by those mentioned who love to hate and cause violence. Their lack of intelligence i.e., pulling down history; taking offense at whatever moves them that day, false inflated grades leaving several generations of vacuous young Americans who have no idea of their history....however, they do know the names and times of T.V. shows...ears/brains plugged into mindless and unintelligible 'music'....
The Left reflects neurotic compulsions in place of analysis of social dynamics.
In other articles, we have suggested that the humanist fervor--the determination to treat humanity as a single entity, as a unity--regardless of cost, is a conceptual effort to return to Nimrod at Babel. That it would take a Dean Swift to adequately capture the complex realities of contemporary America (Gulliver Discovers America). Suffice it to say, we have long dissented from claims that the new Corporate mandates represent wisdom, kindness, tolerance or anything of positive benefit to either sex, or to anyone of any ethnicity, race or age; and, most certainly, not beneficial to anyone with common sense. They insult & deny the higher aspirations of each of us.
bump
Google is now the STASI for the new Super State.
On the other hand, while they seek a monolithic thought control, to dictate values, they remind me more of harridans cackling or gobbling while the teen aged daughters of wealthy landowners are having their heads cut off, than they suggest those actually able to organize the slaughter.
I think I have actually seen that comparison somewhere in some Historical writings... Now I remember. Some Fellow had published a book of mathematics (in the 1850s) in which he makes this very point about the Puritan Harridans imposing their will on others.
Now I wonder if I still have that tab open somewhere? Hmmm....
I doubt if even the closed minds at Google would propose that. But maybe I am giving them more credit for compassion than they merit.
The mood of corporate gate keepers appears to place the highest priority, in all personnel decisions, on never showing any inclination to consider these now forbidden classifications in any human employment decision, except as such might serve the pursuit of "diversity"; which, with "equality" and "non-discrimination," have come to define their highest aspirations. In these pursuits, the classification based on "common sense" has become the most egregious of all--the one to be most desperately avoided!
No I am not.
I am not sure what the penalty was for a first offense--perhaps being confined in the stocks for a day. But the third offense--assuming any Quaker dared same--was a red hot poker through the offender's tongue.
Beware of all those in whom the urge to punish is strong.
At least he got that one right.
I doubt if even the closed minds at Google would propose that. But maybe I am giving them more credit for compassion than they merit.
I think it would only be a question of time. Once you have convinced yourself that you are moral and others are not, and therefore these others need punishment to be administered by you, it becomes an ever expanding vicious circle.
I think cruelty is inherent in the nature of man, and something very much loved by many men is the ability to be cruel without objections from their conscience.
Here is Poe's insight on New England fanaticism in the 1840s:
bump
Think about it. Is any job that Google has to offer, anywhere near as important as the traditional female role in every human society? I mean really, are they such totally self-congratulatory poseurs that they do not see how ridiculous is their implied denial that fundamental femininity, for the sake of femininity, is even more important than any male or female's job, working for an internet giant--even one searching or not searching for particular data (which reflects or does not reflect their insular bias).
Google did not invent hypocrisy; nor absolute intolerance to freedom of thought--the freedom to extend, rather than confine the human quest for knowledge. History is replete with its Galileos being forced to recant discovered truth; with crucifixions & burnings at the stake--manifold and frequent demonstrations of how fanatics enforce their will. Yet here is a company that has built its wealth, reputation & Persona on the human quest for information, firing a highly skilled employee for daring to suggest a logical project in that quest for information, within its very sphere!
Bump
I know, it is questionable taste to quote oneself. But it says what needs to be said.
bump
Bump in recognition of Google hypocrisy!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.