Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/23/2017 4:51:00 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: simpson96

I’m always surprised people use talcum powder on their babies... why take the risk?


2 posted on 08/23/2017 4:55:49 AM PDT by GOPJ (ISIS & Taliban feel Buddha Statues express hatred toward Islam - therefore they can be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
Filthy...filthy...filthy...FILTHY lawyers.
3 posted on 08/23/2017 4:57:24 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

That is the end for J&J.


5 posted on 08/23/2017 5:04:31 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Ridiculous verdict. It’ll probably be tossed.


6 posted on 08/23/2017 5:06:42 AM PDT by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

J&J will of course appeal, and in a couple of years we’ll know how it really turned out...


7 posted on 08/23/2017 5:07:40 AM PDT by Moltke (Reasoning with a liberal is like watering a rock in the hope to grow a building)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

No clear link connects talcum powder to ovarian cancer. Some case-control studies, based on asking women who have ovarian cancer about their history, have found a slightly increased risk. But as the American Cancer Society notes, those kinds of studies can be biased because they rely on a person’s memory of talc use years after the fact.

Two prospective cohort studies, which don’t suffer from that type of hindsight bias, found no increased risk.(snip)

OK how in the hell can they rule it gave her cancer IF the above is correct???


11 posted on 08/23/2017 5:11:30 AM PDT by wyowolf (Be ware when the preachers take over the Republican party...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
"Correlation does not imply causation"

More likely that some other variable correlates both with use of talcum powder and the development of ovarian cancer. But scary that the lawyers convinced 9 jurors that talcum powder was directly responsible.

12 posted on 08/23/2017 5:12:59 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Gun buybacks are one of the most ineffectual public policies that have ever been invented")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

This is nuts.


16 posted on 08/23/2017 5:17:42 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
From link :” Earlier versions of talcum powder sometimes contained asbestos, a known cancer-causing agent. But asbestos hasn't been present in talcum powder in the US since the 1970s.”
18 posted on 08/23/2017 5:20:06 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Message to Trump : I am not tired of winning yet. Please more winning ! Get your crap together fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

The verdict from a “Common Core” jury?!?


19 posted on 08/23/2017 5:20:59 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

So I guess I should have sold the J & J stock...


21 posted on 08/23/2017 5:24:59 AM PDT by subterfuge (Save the monuments!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

“those kinds of studies can be biased because they rely on a person’s memory of talc use years after the fact.”

Q: “Those with ovarian cancer who used talc, even years ago with no proof, might get multi-million dollar awards in court. Non-users get zip. Did you ever use it?”

A: “I’m in. I mean, yes, I must have, whatever it is.”

How can they possibly claim bias when memories are so reliable...


25 posted on 08/23/2017 5:27:07 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

So does this mean those stupid, ambulance chaser lawyers commercials looking for people in the class will go away now?


29 posted on 08/23/2017 5:31:56 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts ("Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment." - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

The jurors should be required to pay half that judgment. Most of it wkk, however, likely go away on appeal.


30 posted on 08/23/2017 5:32:20 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I wonder at what point will companies like Johnson and Johnson decide to pull their entire product lines from places like LA or California entirely due to a hostile legal environment. Would it send a message or like cigarettes in NYC just create a black market


32 posted on 08/23/2017 5:34:56 AM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

If she tests positive for HPV then throw out her case!


35 posted on 08/23/2017 5:38:32 AM PDT by maddogtiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Get ready for deodorant law suits related to breast cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia and kidney disease if not already in courts.

https://www.cmsschicago.org/news-blog/deodorants-link-to-cancer-alzheimers-and-dementia/


41 posted on 08/23/2017 5:54:43 AM PDT by Bronzy (CNN Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

This is ridiculous.


42 posted on 08/23/2017 6:04:06 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Robbery by Tort Attorney.

Buy stock in yacht builders!


44 posted on 08/23/2017 6:05:05 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

There has been NO talc in baby powder since the ‘70s. Unless the plaintiff is elderly, this is a bogus claim.


48 posted on 08/23/2017 6:20:04 AM PDT by txrefugee (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson