One question I have is did Bennet work at the NYT when Giffords was shot? If so, as a NYT editor I would expect him to have read about no link.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The Hillary defense? Is Comey the judge?
2 posted on
08/16/2017 7:00:22 PM PDT by
Vic S
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This guy is a managing editor with a long pedigree as a Journolister and he is able to understand what he wrote and published?
Is he going to get Comey to agree that he had no intent?
3 posted on
08/16/2017 7:01:23 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
4 posted on
08/16/2017 7:01:34 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(Search "Vice Mayor Wes Bellamy tweets" and pass those links on to all you know)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This guy is a managing editor with a long pedigree as a Journolister and he is unable to understand what he wrote and published? Is he going to get Comey to agree that he had no intent?
5 posted on
08/16/2017 7:02:14 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
New York Times editorial page editor James Bennet testified Wednesday in an open hearing that he did not mean to imply a "causal link" between a political action committee tied to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and a 2011 attack on a then-congresswoman and others.When I first saw it, I thought that was exactly what he implied.
6 posted on
08/16/2017 7:02:50 PM PDT by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Hoping that Sarah knocks these media maggots for a HUGE settlement. They deserve so much downside in return for the damage they have done.....
7 posted on
08/16/2017 7:05:02 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Bennett is just another dim witted Leftard hack. I hope the NY Times gets crushed in this lawsuit, although the legal odds may be in their favor simply due to liberal bias. Oh, and the chances that Bennett did not know that Palin endorsed his brother’s opponent? 1 in a bazillion.
8 posted on
08/16/2017 7:05:23 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Searching throughout the country for one honest Democrat....)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Sarah, take the damages in the form of NYT VOTING CLASS STOCK. Take over control of the NYT. Wouldn’t that be hilarious seeing the wailing and knashing of Establishment teeth.
9 posted on
08/16/2017 7:05:55 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Why, naturally not. It was all just a merry mix-up!
Hang him.
To: where's_the_Outrage?; onyx; Abbeville Conservative; abigailsmybaby; afnamvet; alley cat; ...
To Sarah's List.Yes, this story is from Aug 16th.
They are using the Comey Defense quite a bit in this trial.
11 posted on
08/16/2017 7:14:19 PM PDT by
KC_Lion
(If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“I didn’t know that words mean things.”
12 posted on
08/16/2017 7:18:57 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation has ended!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
What a pant load, but he got his damage done...
14 posted on
08/16/2017 7:21:26 PM PDT by
jughandle
(Big words anger me, keep talking.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
New York Times editorial page editor James Bennet testified Wednesday in an open hearing that he did not mean to imply a "causal link" between a political action committee tied to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and a 2011 attack on a then-congresswoman and others.The lies flow so easily from the mouths and keyboards of New York Times staff members.
Even when they're testifying under oath.
Demonstrating expert-level proficiency in telling baldfaced lies must be a condition of employment at the Times.
19 posted on
08/16/2017 7:34:37 PM PDT by
Zeppo
("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
"Mommy, I did not intend to eat all the cookies!"
20 posted on
08/16/2017 7:52:45 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
it's spelled P E R J U R Y
21 posted on
08/16/2017 7:56:19 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
22 posted on
08/16/2017 7:59:50 PM PDT by
Bodleian_Girl
(Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
"What I wasn't trying to say was that there was a direct causal link between this map and the shooting"
That's precisely what you were trying to say.
25 posted on
08/16/2017 9:45:55 PM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This should sink the NYT:
“Bennet said that he became extremely concerned about the content of the editorial late on the night of June 14, after seeing criticisms of it on social media, and spent the early hours of June 15 frantically attempting to have his team determine whether a connection between the Palin PAC and the shooter’s motives actually existed.”
So, he admits publishing something with no idea whether it was true, then trying in vain to find something to support the NYT’s allegations. That would seem to be a textbook example of reckless disregard of the truth that would make a newspaper liable to a public figure for defamation.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
OBAM you say? ... not this time
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson