Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Seruzawa

“A nuclear first strike would be a foreign policy disaster.”

On the other hand, an NK nuclear first strike would a REAL disaster of enormous long-term magnitude, in human terms, in economic terms, psychologically...in any way you can think of. The act of Kim pushing the button, would end the Trump Administration and send the government into complete chaos. Do we want to take any chance that he might successfully hit something when the consequences are so great?


109 posted on 08/08/2017 2:58:56 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Scott from the Left Coast

I doubt that it would end Trump. But still firing first would have fallout affecting not just NK but China, SK, Japan and also Russia. I don’t think firing nukes in a first strike no matter the risk of a launch by Kim is the way to go. Plus there’s no assurance that we would get all their nukes anyhow. Don’t put too much faith in technology. The NKs aren’t a bunch of pathetic ragheads.


119 posted on 08/08/2017 3:36:33 PM PDT by Seruzawa (FABOL - F*** A Bunch Of Liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

Don’t want to sound petty for thinking about the stock market and money, but can you imagine what a 10,000 point drop on the Dow over the several days immediately following a nuclear war with NK would do to our economy?


170 posted on 08/09/2017 8:25:25 AM PDT by Deo volente ("Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on November 8th." Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson