Posted on 08/05/2017 2:34:39 PM PDT by bryan999
Fox News anchor Eric Bolling has been suspended pending an investigation into lewd messages he is accused of sending multiple female coworkers at Fox News and Fox Business Channel.
In a statement, Fox News confirmed Bolling's suspension Saturday afternoon.
"Eric Bolling has been suspended pending the results of an investigation, which is currently underway," a Fox spokesperson said.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
If you didn’t report it then, don’t report it now....it probably is more your imagination that reality...or maybe you just don’t like Trump.......
Juan’s wife would clobber him with a frying pan!
I said this when O’Reilly was canned and I believe it to apply here as well. I bet Megyn Kelly is encouraging these women to go public.
Come on, FR people...don’t play the left’s stupid games.
What are you talking about?
He was very critical about the wall and immigration, but said besides that he liked him. I remember during the primaries he said Trump was one of his top two choices. Asked “top two Republicans?” he wouldn’t say what party the other was in. I suspect it was Bernie.
The Media needs fired for showing photos of Hillary, Rosie, Joy, Moore, etc. Now that’s lewd and abusive! 👍 So I guess FOX is a Puritan Political Corrective Corporation. I guess only White Males have problems. I don’t watch it regularly.
Someone made it up!
I used asterisks! LOL
That’s thanks to Murdoch’s leftist sons and their wives.
True..... And, BTW, I agree with your basic message.
I stopped watching Faux News a few years ago — although I must admit that the husband often has me watching Tucker with him now — and Bolling always struck me as a solid guy and a real man. I can see how the statements he made could have been disappointing to you.
Back when Gingrich was attempting to run for president, I would laugh when he would make so many statements that included the phrase “Callista and I”. I had already lost respect for him prior to that time, but this nonsense really lowered my esteem for him even more.
I believe Ann is right.
“Does not recall...” sending such messages? Uh, no. Anyone would “recall” doing so, unless one was liquored up at the time, and one would have to be pretty liquored up to not recall doing something like that.
He either did or didn’t and should say clearly “I did not” if he didn’t. Period. Anything less is claiming “is” doesn’t really mean “is”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.