Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Rick Perry could fire Robert Mueller
Washington Post ^ | 07/27/2017 | Phillip Bump

Posted on 07/28/2017 8:50:24 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd

Paul Butler is a professor of law at Georgetown University. In an interview with The Post on Thursday, he explained the various ways in which Trump could replace Sessions, if Sessions resigned or were fired.

There are four.

1. Trump nominates a new attorney general who is confirmed by the Senate....

~snip~

2. Trump lets Rosenstein take over. As noted above, this is not Trump’s preferred recourse, since Rosenstein appointed Mueller and could fire him now if he wanted to....

~snip~

3. Trump can appoint someone while the Senate is recessed....

~snip~

This power has been abused. President Barack Obama’s recess appointment of members of the National Labor Relations Board was thrown out by the Supreme Court in 2014...

~snip~

That leaves the fourth option:

4. The Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. This was the heart of what Butler discussed with us....

~snip~

So, in other words, if Sessions were to resign, President Trump could appoint, say, Rick Perry, the secretary of energy, to be the acting attorney general? “The answer is yes,” Butler said, since Perry has already been appointed by Trump and confirmed by the Senate.

But there’s a catch....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mueller; rickperry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: Responsibility2nd
"...This power has been abused. President Barack Obama’s recess appointment of members of the National Labor Relations Board was thrown out by the Supreme Court in 2014......"

Bull$hit... Odumb$hit 'declared' the Congress to be in recess when it wasn't. He was overruled in court specifically on this.

21 posted on 07/28/2017 9:30:46 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Think the Administration should look for an opportunity—the first time a lower Court gets involved in some aspect of the investigation—to seek a writ of prohibition, based upon the clear crossing of a line by the “investigation,” as an attackable entity. (Just a non-fleshed out thought, at this point.)


22 posted on 07/28/2017 9:33:01 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Good points.

And we must remember there was actual credible charges against Nixon. There are NONE against Trump. And I don’t expect there will be any.

This is why I believe Trump should ignore Mueller. Leave him alone. He won’t find anything.

Instead Trump should rally what little Congressional support he has into getting his own Special Investigator. One who will go after the crooks and criminals of the Obama years. And there are dozens of them.


23 posted on 07/28/2017 9:40:20 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Please stop with the “recess” appointments.

This would require Yertle to ditch the traditional “pro forma” standing of the Senate while they are in recess. Yes, it can be done.

No, Yertle won’t do it. Under NORMAL circumstances it would be unlikely because it would mean surrendering a “power” of the Senate (and himself) to help Trump. But under current circumstances? He wouldn’t put himself on the line like this.

There will be no recess appointments because there will be no recess.


24 posted on 07/28/2017 9:44:15 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Or he could just recess appoint Rudy. Bush recess appointed Bolton to the UN.


25 posted on 07/28/2017 10:20:20 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

If they would only use a tenth of that energy to try to protect Trump.


26 posted on 07/28/2017 10:41:59 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
drastic Nixonian results.
Not drastic Clintonian results? I remain unconvinced that there are 20 Republican Senators who hate Trump enough to end their careers by treating Trump worse than the Democrat Senators treated Clinton.

It would delegitimate the Republican Party, as voters resolved to vote "second party."


27 posted on 07/28/2017 1:14:28 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (A press can be 'associated,' or a press can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

;)


28 posted on 07/28/2017 2:24:42 PM PDT by Voluntaryist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson