Climate “Scientists” in Panic: Real Debate and Fact Checking Will Expose “Consensus” Fraud

The New American ^ | 25 July 2017 | William F. Jasper

[detective]

Scott Pruitt and Steven Koonin have climate scientist-activists and their media promoters ranting and sputtering in an epic meltdown. Pruitt is, of course, President Trump’s outspoken administrator in charge of the federal Environmental Protection Agency. Dr. Koonin, a physicist and professor at New York University, was undersecretary of the Energy Department in the Obama administration. Pruitt and Koonin, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, and an impressive lineup of distinguished scientists have stirred the proverbial hornets’ nest by proposing (of all things!) — a scientific debate. Climate alarmists say this is “dangerous,” even “un-American.” And why does the thought of debate stir such ire, angst, and venom in supposedly dispassionate, objective, “scientific” circles? After all, isn’t that what science is all about: testing, challenging, reviewing? Apparently not — at least not when “climate science” is involved. No less a science authority than Al Gore has assured us that when it comes to anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming, AGW, “the science is settled.”

[detective]

This is a must read article.

Finally, someone is actually telling the truth about the dishonest and corrupt global warming industry.

Over $1 billion per day is spent to promote the fraudulent global warming agenda.

[Red Badger]

“climate science” has become a religion. They do not like heretics..........................

[samtheman]

So, the false consensus was/is not 97 percent, but less than 1 percent!

---

It would be way too expensive to make it 97 percent. There aren’t enough Carbon Offset Bucks to spread around to that many scientists!

[mountainlion]

One of Bill Clinton’s consensus was a Barber.

[Techster]

Concur! Must read article.

This is the story behind the story(lie).

[Openurmind]

Fantastic. Thank you!

[Red Steel]

Fraudsters must be afraid Trump is going to put their Globull Warming climate nonsense out of existence.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Great article and great read. Must read is right.

You know you are directly over the target when the flak gets the heaviest.

It thrills me with glee to see the AGW Nazis in a panic to have their junk science exposed to the light of honest scrutiny because they know what we know, that the junk science won’t hold up after being subjected to real chemistry, physics, and climatology.

Even the massively fudged data will not hold up to honest scientific scrutiny.

The gig is almost up. The UN george Soros, and his one world government masters are about to be crushed because they were counting on climate alarmism to herd us into densely packed cities, take away our cars, turn the rural countryside back over to the animals by prohibiting man’s presence, and starve us of cheap energy. All this to destroy the American economy so ordinary Americans will embrace global totalitarian government as their savior fom climate catastrophism.

[mykroar]

bfl

[meatloaf]

The saying “life’s a bitch” is about to be impressed on the climate fraud scientists. The federal cash spigot for their grants was turned off.

[TBP]

Excellent!

[ameribbean expat]

Saw this weekend where Algore went to a climate conference...and talked about population control.

“They’re on to us, time to pull down the tents and move on to the next town. And don’t forget to pack the gin, I mean medicine.”

[KSCITYBOY]

btt

[Noumenon]

But if you’re a Climate Scientologist, all you have to do is belieeeeeeve in the Holy Hockey stick. And offer up hosannahs to your patron saints Barnum, Hubbard and the Holy Lysenko.

[abclily]

OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?

[onedoug]

“For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.” - Richard P. Feynman, physicist

[Cheerio]

[Sergio]

bkmk

[MeganC]

“One of Bill Clinton’s consensus was a Barber.”

All of them were Bolsheviks.

[DeweyCA]

The last paragraph is especially good. It has links to studies showing that the 97% consensus is a blatant fraud.

When it comes to brazen fraud, Santer’s co-author Professor Naomi Oreskes is a tough one to beat. Together with Australian alarmist John Cook, Oreskes, the Harvard “historian of science,” is responsible for perpetrating the “97 percent” lie, the biggest scam backing up the most colossal hoax in history. Replicating Oreskes’ original 2004 study, Dr. Benny Peiser found only 1 percent of published scientific papers explicitly endorse the “consensus view” that anthropogenic sources are responsible for global warming. And that was after Oreskes had used a deceptive selection process to winnow out thousands of studies. So, the false consensus was/is not 97 percent, but less than 1 percent! Likewise, John Cook’s study has been thoroughly eviscerated, revealing an AGW consensus of around 0.5 percent — one-half of a percent, not 97 percent. Obviously, Dr. Koonin’s proposal for a Red Team-Blue Team exercise, with an honest, open debate would threaten to expose this carefully constructed “overwhelming scientific consensus” lie that remains the biggest linchpin of the catastrophic AGW theory. That is why we are seeing such desperate efforts to derail it.