Posted on 07/18/2017 4:57:44 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra
We've reported on the barbaric Islamic procedure known as female genital mutilation, specifically in Michigan. Now, Michigan has passed a law that will sentence those involved in female genital mutilation to prison for up to 15 years, including parents and anyone involved.
Female genital mutilation is nothing like circumcision. It is a barbaric act committed against little girls who are a part of Islamic communities.
The law was both written and passed following the widely circulated story of several girls in Minnesota and Michigan receiving the procedure from a doctor in Detroit. The central government claims that, according to their investigation, female genital mutilation is being pushed by an India-based Muslim sect called Dawoodi Bohra.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
We’ll see how this plays out in practice.
I’m sure this law will be put to the test in the not too distant future.
This is a good law, obviously. But, how come doctors are allowed to do sex change operations at any point in persons life (outside of obvious chromosome and genetic disorders)? That’s mutilation too. Seriously, if a man came up to a doctor and said I identify as a lobster so I want my hands shaped into claws, wouldn’t a sane doctor refer him to a psychiatrist? I think the answer is yes. So, when a man says he wants his genitals changed into the female set why is this considered reasonable? I’m being totally serious with this question. Anyone on the political left out there, please argue for your side on this point I’m making.
What about male genital mutilation as a result of Sharia? That’s allowed?
No wonder men in Michigan are going transgender? Buahahahahaha!
Aubrey Terron:
“I’m so glad that there is finally some reality being shared when it comes to FGC. But what is NOT in Khazan’s article is the attending attitudes about the MALE genital cutting that these people in Africa and the Middle East also practice, and how the hypocrisy of only attempting to end ONE form of genital cutting invalidates their efforts. If anyone hopes to end genital cutting, they need to get these facts straight and stop approaching the issue as if women are the only ones being harmed.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/05/male-circumcision-vs-female-circumcision/392732/
yep. That’s my most excellent, wonderful state.
Since the Muslim-occupied city of Dearborn is in Michigan, this new state law could make things verrrrry interesting there.
Muzzies, the aclu, the splc, dems and other assorted wackos will sue to have it overturned.
And yet abortion is still legal.
“What about male genital mutilation as a result of Sharia? That’s allowed?”
In these terms, it would mean cutting off the penis. Should this be allowed?
btw, where is the feminist outrage over this law? It’s a girls body... bla bla bla
Whatever happened to “First, do no harm”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.