Posted on 07/14/2017 5:36:19 PM PDT by barmag25
A new report about Donald Trump Jr,’s meeting with Russian lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya reveals she brought with her a plastic folder with printed out documents alleging a flow of illicit funds to the Democrats.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
The Hillary cr** was simply to get access. That's what they do.
OMG he looks like a character from the Nintendo game Goldeneye.
Rinat akhmenstan is on the white house visitor logs earlier in the year if I read somewhere earlier. I will see if I can find it.
So now normally the MSM would be obliged to look at every possible source and piece of info pertaining to democrat corruption that is on planet earth until they ID which one this is. I am sure they will get right on reporting any and all Democrat corruption stories.
it gets deeper:
It’s not out of the box to wonder that hate-monger Dellums, who was closely associated with Veselinskaya, might have suggested to her that a visit with Trump (at a time he was looking at a contested convention) would be a grand idea.
oh, but then there’s this (anybody speak Russian?):
24 December 2015 - Office of Senator John McCain:
http://www.pacificpundit.com/2017/07/12/why-did-natalia-veselnitskaya-meet-with-john-mccain-in-2015/
https://www.facebook.com/NataliaVeselnitskaya/posts/1678073685744033
This has to be made into a movie (or maybe even an opera like Nixon in China) including the part where Hillary gets chucked into the van.
This has to be made into a movie (or maybe even an opera like Nixon in China) including the part where Hillary gets chucked into the van.
WTF...Ever...
The RATs better be careful what rocks they turn over...
“WTF...Ever...” <——This. x2
An interesting detail from this article is that Akhmetshin claims he was asked to attend the meeting with her by Veselnitskaia only that morning, and had to show up in jeans and a t-shirt.
Certainly implies that:
1) he and Veselnitskaia had an established working relationship,
2) Veselnitskaia had an agenda wherein Akhmetshin’s presence served some sort of purpose for her.
Unless she needed him as a translator, why would Akhmetshin be useful to N.V. if her real purpose was to pass along documents about the Clintons (especially documents that would need further verification?). He would be a superfluous witness to that (unless him talking about it later WAS the plan). On the other hand, he ,like N.V., was a paid advocate for Russian opponents of the Magnitski Act; N.V. hijacked the meeting to make her case on that issue, so possibly she wanted him there to assist in that.
Options:
1) N.V. and her bosses used hustler Rob Goldstone to get a meeting using the false bait of Clinton-compromising material, while actually intending to lobby for repeal of the Magnitski Act. Possibly they thought this was a way to open a channel of communications with the Trump administration in case Trump was elected.
2) The above, but it was all a ruse to create the appearance of Russian election interference, either for the Russian government (or business interests); for Democrats/Hillary supporters; or two mints in one.
3) N.V. was trying to trade anti-Clinton efforts for help repealing the Magnitski Act, but Trump Jr. either didn’t get it, or deliberately acted that way.
The Russian ambassador supposedly brought up relaxing sanctions in calls with Flynn. Huge oligarch money tied to the Kremlin must be at stake (I suspect US interests related to Obama, Clinton, and the Democrats benefit from keeping them in place). The whole “Russian collusion” thing seems to lead back to efforts attack the sanctions.
And he’s wearing his elephant shirt instead of his donkey shirt...
The world wanted a man in charge of the USA.
No more women, and certainly not another one.
The Akhmetshin angle has only served to complicate the matter to the point where the descriptions of the meeting aren’t even coherent anymore. N.V. and Akhmetshin have described the meeting so differently that it doesn’t even sound like they were both there at all.
Goldstone first attempted to setup a meeting on June 3, but on June 7 he still didn’t know who the Russians were.
Jun 7, 2016, at 5:19 PM, Rob Goldstone wrote: ... I will send the names of the two people meeting with you for security when I have them later today.
That may be the object.
We’ll know something went on, but it will be impossible to say what.
It would not be hard for the average researcher to show an illegal flow of money into the Clinton Foundation just using public sources.
a flow of illicit funds to the Democrats
Shouldn’t that be what the media is focused on?
Foreign money going to the democrats?
Isn’t that against the law?
Did any Russian money go to the Republicans?
Is anyone saying that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.