More Fake News?
To: mandaladon
NYSlimes is the home of fake news, 24/7 everyday of the year.
2 posted on
06/30/2017 7:43:08 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(CNN is thrasing around like a worthless old rooster, after the farmer, (AT&T), chopped its head off!)
To: mandaladon
Pretty soon it’ll be reduced to “we heard it on Harriet the spy”.
3 posted on
06/30/2017 7:48:42 AM PDT by
jalisco555
("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
To: mandaladon
Obama, Hillary, many Dems, and the MSM all repeated this narrative several times over.
4 posted on
06/30/2017 7:55:50 AM PDT by
deweyfrank
(Nobody's Perfect)
To: mandaladon
The Russians didn’t of course. This was just an explanation for why the batty old grandma lost yet another election.
But if Russia did hello stop hillary,that clearly makes them an ally of America.
6 posted on
06/30/2017 8:06:42 AM PDT by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
To: mandaladon
No one will even notice this retraction but the 17 agencies bit will stick in their head.
Retractions are like "I'm Sorry" after doing something wrong deliberately and with malice....means nothing.
To: mandaladon
I would bet that 99% of all Freepers understood well that the 17 agencies story was a phony that has knowingly been repeated endlessly by the MSM. And they have known it for at least 6 months.
The MSM has become synonymous with Fake News.
8 posted on
06/30/2017 8:25:55 AM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
To: mandaladon
9 posted on
06/30/2017 8:45:39 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
To: mandaladon
Blatantly missing is an explanation of WHY the other 13 agencies did NOT agree, and what their assessment was.
Inquiring minds want to know!
10 posted on
06/30/2017 8:48:37 AM PDT by
Be Free
(I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
To: mandaladon
this story was pushed by everyone for over a year.
Why do we have to keep debunking it ?
The ICA declassified report has been out since 2017/01/06
How the NYTimes could still push their narrative is beyond me.
and it's not 4 agencies, it's only 3, so the NYTimes needs to make another correction.
From the 2017/01/06 ICA report:
This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA)
and here is their assessment
All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA and FBI have high confidence in this judgment; NSA has moderate confidence.
Note: The definition of "High Confidence", as describe in the ICA report:
"High confidence generally indicates that judgments are based on high-quality information from multiple sources. High confidence in a judgment does not imply that the assessment is a fact or a certainty; such judgments might be wrong.
If they read the report, they would see that the sources are mostly from RT television and social media:
How to stop this madness ?
To: mandaladon
WHY the HELL are there 17.....SEVENTEEN...Spy agencies in this country????? No wonder they are so inept.
12 posted on
06/30/2017 9:09:10 AM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: mandaladon
Why do we have 17 Intel agencies?
Seem double redundant.
To: mandaladon
“Editors — and yes, that especially means copy editors — save reporters and the Times every day from countless errors, large and small,” (NYT editors) say in the letter.
Ha!
16 posted on
06/30/2017 9:37:47 AM PDT by
agave
(5)
To: mandaladon
By 17, they meant 3 agencies. And by 3, they meant they took the word of the DNC funded CrowdStrike.
To: mandaladon
I want to know who is covering up for pappy Francis.... IF anyone messed with our elections it was the daddy in Rome, performing a fake mass on our Southern border.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson