Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Russian naval missile system shown off to the world
Russia Beyond the Headlines ^ | June 28, 2017 | NIKOLAI LITOVKIN

Posted on 06/28/2017 7:06:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

A new sea-based missile system was presented to the world on June 28 during a naval show in St. Petersburg. However, the project hasn’t yet been greenlighted by the Ministry of Defense, so it remains to be seen if it will be adopted by the Russian military.

What’s the difference between the sea and land versions?

The new “Pantsir-ME” will be able to intercept missiles during rough seas, rain, wind, and even storms. It will also be more compact and covered with an anticorrosive sheath to ensure its longevity.

“The biggest difference is that ‘Pantsir-S’ missiles have to intercept targets coming at them from above - mostly via predicted flight paths. Meanwhile, anti-ship missiles reflect the water’s surface and travel close to waves during storms which makes it hard for computer systems to predict their flight path,” Alexander Zhukov, chief designer at the High Precision Systems corporation, told RBTH. The company builds Pantsir systems for the Russian army.

Another big difference is the fire rate. The Pantsir-S systems can shoot 80 artillery projectiles per second (4,800 per minute), while the sea-based system will be able to fire 160 projectiles per second (nearly 10,000 rounds per minute).

The Pantsir-ME can track and shoot down four air targets at the same time including jets, bombers, UAVs, and missiles.

The Pantsir-ME. / ZUMA Press/Global Look Press

“The Pantsir-ME creates a 20 km anti-aircraft dome around the ship it’s installed on. That makes it an effective defense weapon in potential future conflicts,” CEO of High Precision Systems, Alexander Denisov, told RBTH.

Which ships will get the new Pantsir-ME?

As some military experts believe, the new system will be installed on smaller coastal ships.

“At first, the Pantsyr-ME will be used on the Caspian fleet - then other Russian ships in different regions will get the system,” said editor-in-chief of the Arsenal Otechestva magazine Viktor Murakhovsky.

Meanwhile, Denisov said the Russian Navy has already ordered a number of the systems.

“The order would secure the company's factories for years to come,” Denisov added, without confirming if pen had officially been put to paper.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; ciws; navy; pantsir; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2017 7:06:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

For some reason, my first thought was of ED-209.


2 posted on 06/28/2017 7:12:50 PM PDT by Malcolm Reynolds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, I can’t say anything as to how it works or how formidable it is. But it certainly looks Bad Ass.


3 posted on 06/28/2017 7:13:49 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm Reynolds

ditto that.


4 posted on 06/28/2017 7:14:29 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Maxine Waters for House Minority Leader!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

New Panzer missiles. They’re happy with themselves. Should we be concerned?


5 posted on 06/28/2017 7:14:41 PM PDT by Ciexyz (I just changed my voter registration to non-affiliated. I'm still conservative & traditionalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is this like the Phalanx?


6 posted on 06/28/2017 7:16:23 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That thing looks really Bad Ass. The US Navy should be very concerned, IMO.


7 posted on 06/28/2017 7:18:19 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Phalanx “integrated” with a point defense missile system. It is much heavier than the Phalanx though, so you can’t fix it or retrofit it to a lot of ships.


8 posted on 06/28/2017 7:29:50 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb; laplata
It does look formidable. I'm imagining, though, the operator engaging a target, then getting hit with the latest version of WannaCry.

су́ка блядь!

9 posted on 06/28/2017 7:40:27 PM PDT by Malcolm Reynolds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They probably got some of this tech in the Skolkovo project courtesy of the Clintons...


10 posted on 06/28/2017 7:47:39 PM PDT by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

There’s a few lighter weight versions of previous versions and IIRC the Russians are fitting them to more and more vessels.


11 posted on 06/28/2017 7:48:21 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I want one.

L


12 posted on 06/28/2017 7:50:57 PM PDT by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm Reynolds
For some reason, my first thought was of ED-209.

Same here. Hope those gals aren't standing under it when it's tested. But maybe they're already partially deaf from beating drums.

13 posted on 06/28/2017 7:55:36 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nothing shouts Russian military prowess like mini skirts and go-go boots. Not that I’m complaining, just saying.


14 posted on 06/28/2017 8:06:27 PM PDT by SpirituTuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
so you can’t fix it or retrofit it to a lot of ships.

During WWII, when the US was retrofitting existing destroyers to carry more AA guns, they ended up having to lose armor, else the ships were too top-heavy. So a number of them lost the tops of the aft turrets, replacing inches of steel by waterproofed canvass.

15 posted on 06/28/2017 8:13:19 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This looks like a variant of CIWS. If you are throwing that many rounds per second this is basically a 50 caliber Gatling machine gun like CIWS (Close In Weapon System)


16 posted on 06/28/2017 8:14:49 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The only problem I see with this weapon system is the fifth ‘girl’ from the left? That’s a seaman!


17 posted on 06/28/2017 8:21:42 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

18 posted on 06/28/2017 8:55:01 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malcolm Reynolds

I hope we have a “WannaCry” to deal with it.


19 posted on 06/28/2017 9:08:03 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laplata

We probably do, since the source code for it came from our intel community.


20 posted on 06/28/2017 9:28:53 PM PDT by Malcolm Reynolds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson