Posted on 06/26/2017 8:17:29 AM PDT by GonzoII
Thanks for noting.
This one is ez - there are plenty of other places that would do this. No reason to force this one place to do it.
I am hoping for a slap down here.
They haven’t ruled yet.
Trained legal minds would surely have an answer to this question. Doesn’t a law have to apply across the board to all citizens and not to an individual or a group?
Any bakery owned by muslins would refuse a homosexual cake. But they don’t get targeted, baited, entrapped or fined by social justice commissions.
It seems odd that individual citizens can get nailed for taking a stand while whole population groups who do the same are free to continue without a comment.
I’m aware...
The LGBTQs don’t really want a cake. They could get that from an LGBTQ baker. What they really want is a Christian baker to REFUSE so the law suits and court cases ensue.
But to what end? To force the guy to bake a cake. Which he probably won’t do. Or he’ll mix feces in with it. Stupid stupid stupid waste of money and time.
They want to bring Christianity to its knees.
The individuals being singled out here are ones in business. Muslims would also be effected.
This nonsense has been foisted on us by public accomodation laws which strip rights from anyone in business. IMHO, this is patently unconstitutional if applied to the self employed.
No, I’m not a lawyer.
From "Stay out of my bedroom" (which I am happy to do, BTW), to
"Celebrate me or I'll sue you into oblivion" in one generation.
Until muzzies are arrested or fined for not serving gays, normal people, people with working dogs, doing that to Christians is unfair, illegal, and immoral.
psy·cho·sissīˈkōsəs/noun
"According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages.The first stage being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least 3 generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism.Most of the activity of the department [KGB] was to compile huge amount / volume of information, on individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion. Publisher, editors, journalists, uh actors, educationalists, professors of political science. Members of parliament, representatives of business circles.Most of these people were divided roughly into two groups: those who would tow the Soviet foreign policy, they would be promoted to positions of power through media and public manipulation; [and] those who refuse the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated OR executed physically, come Revolution. "--KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov--Soviet Subversion of the Free Press (Ideological subversion, Destabilization, CRISIS - and the KGB)
This would not have happened had the bakery shop been owned by Muslims...of course SS couples would not have gone to such a place.....double standards.
The goal is punish "bigots" and force them out of business and, ultimately, to destroy the religious freedom to dissent against homosexuality.
They try to hire a gay caterer to cater their event and he refuses. Should he be forced to cater the event or get fined out of business?
You might want to see how a similar case went in another state. And in this case, the state also went after the business owner:
Arlene’s Flower Shop:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlene%27s_Flowers_lawsuit
It takes four judges on SCOTUS to agree to hear a case. If so, it would be a good bet it was Gorsuch rather than Kennedy that agreed to hear it.
We can do this: one man’s rights end where another man’s rights begin. Nobody should be able to enslave anybody.
Having said that, the ruling will probably focus on the distinction between a private business and a public business.
A prostitute can discriminate on any basis at all, because of the intimate service he or she provides. But a restaurant cannot discriminate on the basis of race.
So, considering the matter carefully, I will issue my fatwah:
A business may not withhold the sale of any standard product or service offered for sale to the public, except in for reasons that are sensible (such as a height restriction on riders of roller coasters).
However, a business may refuse to customize the products or services it offers on any basis other than those bases restricted by law; and,
Furthermore, because of the free exercise of religion, when sincerely-held religious beliefs are involved, business may even refuse to customize products or services in some cases where discrimination is restricted by law. Resolution of these conflicts involve balancing the free exercise of religion against the public utility involved.
In the case of wedding cakes, the available of standard products and services is a close substitute for customized products and services, so even where a particular baker has a local monopoly, the scales are tipped in favor of the free exercise of religion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.