Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch: Susan Rice ‘Unmasking’ Documents Moved from NSC to Obama Library
Breitbart ^ | 19 Jun 2017 | Kristina Wong

Posted on 06/20/2017 12:57:04 PM PDT by Cheerio

The National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as many as five years, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coverup; judicialwatch; obama; obamalibrary; rice; surveillance; trumpwiretaps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Anything out of Congress? No, I didn't expect Congress to ever go after either on of these two.



CROOKS and UNDICTED FELONS.
1 posted on 06/20/2017 12:57:05 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’ll bet the documents then go missing.

Any takers?


2 posted on 06/20/2017 12:59:04 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

This is pure crap.

Zero and Susan are playing chicken.

Let’s see who blinks.


3 posted on 06/20/2017 1:00:08 PM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Time to visit the Obama library wearing extra large tube socks - a la Sandy Begerler


4 posted on 06/20/2017 1:01:15 PM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Those documents are government documents, therefore documents of the people, and must be seized from Obama’s control.


5 posted on 06/20/2017 1:01:44 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Kinda admitting the president ordered the whole eavesdropping mess isn’t it? Gotta say though it sure is slicker than Sandy Bergers’ socks.


6 posted on 06/20/2017 1:02:19 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

If the docs are sealed for 5 years then one can’t prove the unmasking, but then one cannot also disprove it. That means it can be used as a club to beat the Dems with, charging widespread surveillance of anyone and everyone. Straight from the Dems playbook...


7 posted on 06/20/2017 1:02:50 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Jeff Session better RAISE HIS PROFILE and start issuing WARRANTS AND SUBPOENAS OR I AM DONE VOTING FROM HERE ON FORWARD!!!!

Obama, Hillary, Lynch, Susan Rice, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, Valerie Jarrett, Bryan Pagliano, Lois Lerner, John Koskinen, etc., are ALL criminals guilty of serious FELONIES and should be PROSECUTED IMMEDIATELY!!!

WTF ARE YOU, JEFF SESSIONS!!!

8 posted on 06/20/2017 1:04:20 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Feminism DESTROYED females)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

There is a Hugh and series difference between the N.S.C. and the NSA, who I am sure has the documents as well.


9 posted on 06/20/2017 1:04:54 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
I’ll bet the documents then go missing.

There is no question in my mind that all documents will mysteriously disappear. And rather than Republicans issuing court orders to preserve the integrity of these documents, they will slow-walk any comment and allow their good buddies, the Democrats to - once again - get off scot free.

There can be no mistake that the distinct lack of any Republican action is deliberate and willful. Sure they may come out eventually and make some phony statement, but we all know that if we're just now reading about this, it's too late. The documents are long gone. Anyone seen Sandy Burger?

To think I once trusted Republicans to do the right thing. They are corrupt.

10 posted on 06/20/2017 1:05:09 PM PDT by Obadiah (Global warming caused Hillary to lose the election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

The Jeff is not in session right now. Leave a message after the beep.


11 posted on 06/20/2017 1:06:25 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

What right did he have to move those?

Go seal the doors on that place and get them.


12 posted on 06/20/2017 1:06:27 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

CONFIRMED: Trump Can Get The Unmasking Records Out of Obama Library - Big League Politics

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/6idsk4/confirmed_trump_can_get_the_unmasking_records_out/


13 posted on 06/20/2017 1:06:38 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic wotk using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

“CROOKS and UNINDICTED FELONS”

Nope.

Much worse than that.

(And he was elected TWICE by all the scu&bags in the electorate.)

IMHO


14 posted on 06/20/2017 1:06:45 PM PDT by ripley (ually to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Good point... why would the be moved to OBAMA’s library unless OBAMA ordered it?


15 posted on 06/20/2017 1:07:25 PM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Well there is a recourse. The response to Judicial Watch was a FOIA request, and even if they had the documents they don’t have to comply right away - if at all. But there is recourse, according to this link from Big League Politics. The records are currently at The National Archives, because there is no Obama library at this point. It hasn’t been built yet. But those records are still susceptible to a congressional or DOJ/FBI investigation subpoena:

http://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-trump-can-get-unmasking-records-obama-library/


16 posted on 06/20/2017 1:07:36 PM PDT by antonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

They have no right (that meaning little or nothing) to remove the *requests* for unmaskings.


17 posted on 06/20/2017 1:09:21 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The Republicans will be right on it, right after they allow the Democrats to slander Trump for four years with false charges.


18 posted on 06/20/2017 1:09:31 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Maybe he has them in a lockbox on his desk.


19 posted on 06/20/2017 1:09:42 PM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Yep. Uh huh, 10/4, you bet. He just admitted he done it and says he thinks it’s funny.


20 posted on 06/20/2017 1:09:58 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson