Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE - USS Fitzgerald involved in collision
US Navy web site ^ | 16-June-2017

Posted on 06/17/2017 3:16:48 AM PDT by topher

tory Number: NNS170616-20Release Date: 6/16/2017 4:57:00 PM

From U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

PHILIPPINE SEA (NNS) -- USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62) was involved in a collision with a merchant vessel at approximately 2:30 a.m. local time, June 17, while operating about 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, Japan.

As of this time, there have been two patients requiring medical evacuation. One was Cmdr. Bryce Benson, Fitzgerald's commanding officer, who was transferred to U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka and is reportedly in stable condition. A second MEDEVAC is in progress. Other injured are being assessed. There are seven Sailors unaccounted for; the ship and the Japanese Coast Guard continues to search for them.

Although Fitzgerald is under her own power, USS Dewey (DDG 105) got underway this morning as well as several U.S. Navy aircraft, and will join Japanese Coast Guard and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force helicopters, ships and aircraft to render whatever assistance may be required.

"U.S. and Japanese support from the Navy, Maritime Self Defense Force and Coast Guard are in the area to ensure that the Sailors on USS Fitzgerald have the resources they need to stabilize their ship. As more information is learned, we will be sure to share to it with the Fitzgerald families and when appropriate the public. Thank you for your well wishes and messages of concern. All of our thoughts and prayers are with the Fitzgerald crew and their families," said Adm. John Richardson, Chief of Naval Operations.

"Right now we are focused on two things: the safety of the ship and the well-being of the Sailors," said Adm. Scott Swift, commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet. "We thank our Japanese partners for their assistance."

For more information, visit www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.

For more news from U.S. Pacific Fleet, visit www.cpf.navy.mil.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burkeclass; fitzgerald; japan; usnavy; ussfitzgerald
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last
To: PIF

What a shame. Maybe it is R.I.P. for the missing sailors who couldn’t even swim away. Something about how the two boats hit one another maybe — danger zones close to point of collision.


21 posted on 06/17/2017 4:03:33 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: topher
Update...

Stricken destroyer Fitzgerald returns home; 7 sailors still missing

Continuing prayers for our sailors.

22 posted on 06/17/2017 4:03:35 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk; All
Melborne-Evans Incident
23 posted on 06/17/2017 4:05:24 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Two berthing spaces were flooded...


24 posted on 06/17/2017 4:06:42 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Lots of photos of damage:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4612334/USS-Fitzgerald-involved-collision-merchant-vessel.html


25 posted on 06/17/2017 4:07:14 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: topher

I suspect NKOR engineered accident. 2 giant ships just don’t collide without intention from one party to the other and I doubt this was U.S ship captain that was inatentive.

The news is strange. They’re not trying to smear Trump with this. Like the wording is too perfect to be informative that a ship was damaged and people lost, killed and injured, but no indications of the circumstances and the demographics of the merchant vessel.


26 posted on 06/17/2017 4:07:34 AM PDT by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

We never know when or how God will schedule an end to a life. “It is appointed once for man to die and then the judgment.” We are wise to live portably unto eternity.


27 posted on 06/17/2017 4:09:55 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

This is probably an incredibly stupid, tinfoil-hatted question, but after looking at that damage, could the merchant vessel have intended to hit our vessel?


28 posted on 06/17/2017 4:11:30 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

If the guys were on the port side, they could have been thrown into the water as the ship rolled with the force of the collision and then sucked under as the ship continued its forward momentum. If on starboard where the impact occurred, they would have been crushed to pulp and so still onboard under the mashed metal.

Either way RIP.


29 posted on 06/17/2017 4:11:40 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Oh maybe morale and vigilance was low. One does not emerge from an Obamic miasma overnight.


30 posted on 06/17/2017 4:11:49 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

No, not possible.


31 posted on 06/17/2017 4:16:49 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PIF

The wreck of the USS Fitzgerald... Well at least the whole thing didn’t sink. Thank God for that it was not even worse.


32 posted on 06/17/2017 4:17:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

Trump has nothing to do with so why bring it up?


33 posted on 06/17/2017 4:17:37 AM PDT by angcat (THANK YOU LORD FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Yes but those two ships in t Melbourne collision were in formation. These two were not?


34 posted on 06/17/2017 4:17:52 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Sabotage to make it blunder into the battleship?


35 posted on 06/17/2017 4:18:36 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: topher

There were conflicting reports from the U.S. Navy (my Navy, I’m retired USNR) about this incident. One of the first official reports didn’t mention lost sailors, or an injured skipper.


36 posted on 06/17/2017 4:19:48 AM PDT by Ace's Dad (BTW, "Ace" is now Captain Ace. But only when I'm bragging about my airline pilot son!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Now that is a horrifying thought.


37 posted on 06/17/2017 4:19:56 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: topher

Both vessels, are required to have an AIS system. I know the Navy would be operating under “stealth” mode, but the container ship would show on their system. Bridge to bridge communication should have come into play, to avoid the accident.

The AIS on my vessel is interfaced with the radar and plotter and set to 3 nautical miles. Alarms would have been sounding when another vessel entered that range.

What kind of action was taken to avoid the accident?


38 posted on 06/17/2017 4:20:12 AM PDT by Capt_Hank (btu's...kcal's...to kJ's, but my activation energy is still high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

My thought too. I thought ship collisions went out with the advent of radar. Captain’s naval career is over no matter whose fault. Probably somehow related to Obamas bollixed military social engineering.


39 posted on 06/17/2017 4:21:22 AM PDT by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Believe me 100’s of people are traveling to Japan to hyper scrutinize this accident/incident especially if she was carrying nuclear tipped weapons(not sure if the Navy stills deploys those types of weapons). I think there is a weapons magazine close to where that damage is on the starboard side. The final report will be public. On this I am pretty sure.


40 posted on 06/17/2017 4:22:34 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson