Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/15/2017 11:27:00 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: maggief

Didn’t that have to do with Palin’s use of the word targeting? How tenuous can you get?!


2 posted on 06/15/2017 11:32:22 AM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Despite the near impossibility to do it, the NYT is becoming more RED and less READ.


3 posted on 06/15/2017 11:32:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Did the scum NYT correct IT only because Palin may have filed a lawsuit against them?


4 posted on 06/15/2017 11:32:36 AM PDT by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
The NYT handed the map to the shooter.

Imagine if a maniac shot a bunch of Hillary aides, and it turned out that he worked as a campaign vol for Trump, and that Breitbart had given up the location of their unsecure picnic.


5 posted on 06/15/2017 11:32:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

In other cases they seem happy to make changes without a correction notice. In this case the correction notice is there and mentions “the link” two times. And points out that it was “not established”, leaving readers able to believe it did exist if that’s what they wanted to believe after having it mentioned 2 additional times.

I’d bet they intentionally used the correction to reinforce the main point they wanted to make.


7 posted on 06/15/2017 11:36:48 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

They only took it back because she threatened to sue their asses..she still should..but its the New York Slimes, they are worthless, and I wouldn’t wipe my behind with their pathetic excuse of a “Paper”


8 posted on 06/15/2017 11:41:34 AM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I’m surprised they printed a correction. Normally, they just don’t care to correct the propaganda.


9 posted on 06/15/2017 11:41:39 AM PDT by henkster (Orwell, Rand and Huxley would not be proud of our society, but they'd have no trouble recognizing it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Funding a play about the assassination of Trump is just art, according to the NYSlimes. It isn’t hate speech.


13 posted on 06/15/2017 11:59:57 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Rush talked about this this morning. He strongly encouraged Sarah Palin to sue the New York Times for libel.


14 posted on 06/15/2017 12:01:13 PM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief; onyx; Abbeville Conservative; abigailsmybaby; afnamvet; alley cat; antceecee; ...
Ping to Sarah's Winning List.

The Fake New York Times didn't want Sarah to end up owning half the paper.


15 posted on 06/15/2017 12:40:00 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I saw a screen grab (since been deleted) from DU...long before Palin’s ‘targeting’ map...that showed all of the Repub candidates DU was ‘targeting’.

Did NYSlimes ever report on that?


16 posted on 06/15/2017 12:54:04 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

this was no accident, it was on purpose. Everyone will remember their initial assertion, few will remember their correction.

The NYT, CNN, etc., are all bottom feeding scum, and liars.


18 posted on 06/15/2017 1:22:22 PM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

I’m guessing that some high-powered lawyer connected with Palin gave the Lefties at the Slimes an offer that they couldn’t refuse...because it SURELY isn’t because the Slimes felt bad about printing that smear in the first place.


23 posted on 06/15/2017 2:21:03 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

G*D damn fish rapper!!!


24 posted on 06/15/2017 2:42:16 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Taking the attention off of something so so obvious. Palin’s connection is that she is conservative and an effective speaker. The connections of the left with the baseball killer are a lot more substantial and include many many highly publicicized pointed incitements to actually, like behead, kill the opposition.


28 posted on 06/15/2017 4:46:14 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
The New York Slimes:


29 posted on 06/15/2017 4:55:39 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
Amazing. Fake news is fashion.
32 posted on 06/19/2017 7:49:25 AM PDT by niklogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson