Posted on 06/13/2017 10:21:46 AM PDT by sickoflibs
A federal judge ordered Homeland Security Monday to reinstate an amnesty for a Dreamer and blasted the government for running roughshod over a young woman in a ruling that breaks new ground in legal rights for illegal immigrants.
Judge Mark H. Cohen ruled that the department didnt follow its own procedures when it stripped Jessica Colotl of her status under President Obamas 2012 amnesty, known in government-speak as DACA.
The judge ordered her deportation amnesty and her work permit be kept in place, and sent U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services the Homeland Security agency that handles applications back to consider Ms. Colotls case again.
The public has an interest in government agencies being required to comply with their own written guidelines instead of engaging in arbitrary decision making, Judge Cohen said.
When the Obama administration established the program it said DACA was entirely at the discretion of Homeland Security, and could be revoked.
But the decision by Judge Cohen, who was appointed to the federal courts by Mr. Obama, suggests But the decision by Judge Cohen, who was appointed to the federal courts by Mr. Obama, suggests illegal immigrants can go to court to claim they have a right to a process, if not an outcome.
Judge Cohen said the governments interest in enforcing its laws does not justify them running roughshod over [Ms. Colotl] by ignoring their own required procedures.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Paroles can be revoked and that's all that's happened.
Looks like those who were approved for DACA now have a right to stay here.
Question is : why is the government still approving MORE of them for DACA?
We aren’t voting our way out of this mess.
A judge can’t compel one president to obey a former president’s executive order. DHS MUST ignore him, or further cede Article II Executive power to the judiciary, a major breach of oath.
Maybe what is needed more is picking up judges who work against America. Judicial supremacy over the other branches needs to be stopped.
DACA has no legal basis.
It must be ended if we are to restore the rule of law.
Allowing it to continue gives judges an excuse to make rulings like this.
What EO has been erased?
President Trump has not rescinded DACA.
He should have.
Ask the judge what legal authority he has to try and reinstate an erased EO?
So far they seem to be proving you wrong.
President Trump is continuing the illegal DACA program as if it were law and not something dreamed up by Obama.
He promised to eliminate this and did not.
This ruling is a result of that.
DACA was not rescinded as promised.
It is still in effect because President Trump did not keep his promise to stop it.
Wouldnt a judge just rule such an order as unconstitutional as with the Muslim country travel ban?
Obama issues edict.
Trump and company cancel the edict.
Judge says Trump should follow policy, but makes no mention of Obama not following policy.
B O N K E R S
Amazing how Due Process makes a comeback when a Democrat is not in office. I'm all for the young lady having the right to bring her argument into a fair court... and I'm almost shocked that the WaPost would write something so honest and Constitutionally proper as "if not an outcome"... and now I see that it was the WA Times, not the WA post, LOL. My worldview hath been restored. ;)
“We arent voting our way out of this mess.”
The sooner people realize this the sooner we can start truly righting this ship called the United States of America.
I’m just hoping with all my being that “it” happens while I can still make an able bodied contribution.
Its been erased???
Then how did this happen:
Mr. Trump appears to be maintaining the pace of the Obama administration, with more than 17,000 new two-year amnesties and more than 107,000 renewal applications approved from Jan. 1 to March 30. Both numbers are comparable to the final full three months of President Obamas tenure.
US C+INS report on DACA 2017 (March 31, 2017 report)
Easy solution: Rewrite the procedures.
1. Are you illegal?
-Yes? Your amnesty is revoked and you will be deported.
-No? Then why are you bothering DHS when they are busy deporting criminals?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.