Posted on 05/29/2017 12:19:10 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The Possible Reasons Big Corporations Are So Eager for Trump to Break His Promise on Paris Climate Deal
I didn’t realize Trump made any promises about the paris climate deal. Except that he would back out. Which all sources indicate he is doing.
That's BS. Ours are the major corporations. Europe can shut them out but then Euope raises iits own costs oth financially and diplomatically as I am sure that sort of government action would bring retaliation from this end.
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
Sen. Rand Paul: Say au revoir to Paris Climate Agreement
Republican Senators Urge Trump to Exit Paris Climate Deal
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here, and here
There is an entire financial strategy that has been created surrounding tax credits and similar invented incentives.
Companies have been working on it for decades. There are billions at stake.
Of course the companies that have developed strategies to game the system want to be able to use those strategies. They pick up the profits and slough the costs to the US Government and, of course, therefore to us.
President Trump promised he would get out of the Paris Climate Hoax. We expect him to keep his promises. If he does, all will be well for 2020.
It’s easier to dig up carbon credits than real coal or oil.
Interesting how the press keeps trotting out Cloud Peak as a representative of the U.S. coal industry. Cloud Peak is nether representative nor American. Its the residue of Rio Tinto's mining coal operations in the U.S. and its run by a British guy. When Peabody was sending Palmer out on the ciruit, Rio Tinto was sending a British guy to the same meetings.
Because it is a ridiculous money drain and job killer
Copy that to Jvanka who are urging Trump to stay with the Paris accords.
I suspect, he’ll call it a treaty and submit it for 2/3 senate ratification. This will kill the deal.
Because the global warming hoax is a real drag on the economy.
(like governments fining farmers for plowing their own land or collecting rain water)
(Solindra anyone?)
On the face of it, that would seem the best way to put a stake through the heart of this monster.
“I suspect, he’ll call it a treaty and submit it for 2/3 senate ratification. This will kill the deal”
I think he might do this but don’t be so sure it would not get the 2/3. It would start with 48 yes votes before any debate. I think there is a damn good chance the POS would pass. There are a lot of AGW fools on the GOP side.
I am already ticked he didn’t just get us out as promised leaving us squirming while he “evolves” on the issue as Cohn put it.
That really doesn't mean they wouldn't do it. I mean they've already allowed LOTS of people into their countries whose intent is to destroy them. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
BTW, you need to proof-read your posts a little better. :)
Patriots are reminded that federal government involvement in worldwide, politically correct global warming politics is not simply a matter of opinion.
In fact, even if the whole world, including Pres. Trump, supported US financial involvement in uncountable, worldwide government spending using the excuse of global warming, it remains that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for global warming purposes, not even for the states.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
The feds would first need to successfully petition the states for a global warming amendment to the Constitution in order for the feds to do anything just in the states, federal involvement in world-wide global warming politics another major constitutional hurdle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.