Posted on 05/24/2017 12:31:21 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: Back in April, an ISIS supporter attack in Paris, Champs-Elysees, a couple weeks before the French elections — by the way, have you heard what they have done in Paris? I don’t know if this is the mayor or if it’s this new president. Do you know what they did? This is a sign, folks. This is a comforting sign to show you how tough the French are in this fight against terrorism. You know what they’ve done?
They’ve turned off the lights in the Eiffel Tower at midnight. You know how that is bound to frighten the terrorists? I mean, why didn’t we think of something like this earlier? What a statement. What a show of force. Turning off the lights on the Eiffel Tower at midnight to show solidarity with the victims of terror attacks. This is classic. This is like a hashtag, #bringbackourgirls. It doesn’t do anything. But the people involved think they are really contributing. They think they’re really doing something meaningful. And all it means is that no impediment to future terrorism is handed down.
We are, in fact, quote after quote after quote today from people in the U.K., from Theresa May to others, “This is the new norm.” They don’t say it that way but their attitudes are clear that they have no ideas, nothing to do here. They’re so afraid of offending Muslims and Islamists.
I have a question, ladies and gentlemen. If Islam is so peaceful, why is everybody so damn frightened of offending them? And on the other hand, if Christianity is so violent as people like Whoopi Goldberg and others tell us, why is nobody afraid to offend Christians? People laugh at, make fun of, and mock Christians all day long with no fear whatsoever. But you so much as think anything offensive about Islam, and they descend on you and they accuse you of violating political correctness and they beg you to shut up.
In fact, there’s United States Senator out there today blaming Trump for terrorist recruitment by daring to criticize them. Yeah, Chris somebody. There’s a lot of Chrises in the Senate. Let me find the guy. It’s in the sound bites here. Chris Murphy. This is the CNN Situation Room, audio sound bite number seven. Wolf Blitzer speaking. This guy’s from Connecticut, about the terror attack in Manchester, England. Blitzer says, “Do you believe the attacker deliberately targeted this –” (laughing) Do you believe — deliberate — this is what I mean! Asking a United States Senator if he thinks a radical Islamist terrorist purposely, deliberately targeted — yes! And do you know why?
Who was the performing artist at this concert? Ariana Grande. What she is? A woman, right? What do you think over half the audience of this show was? Women and girls! And Wolf Blitzer is asking, “Do you think it might have been deliberate?” I even saw a story, you know the Washington Post, folks, I can’t make this up. The Washington Post thinks they’re really on to something here. They think there might be some deep misogyny in terror circles.
I kid you not! There’s actually a story where the Washington Post has figured out these guys don’t like women! And it’s almost as deep a revelation as TIME magazine’s cover story back in the nineties that men and women are born different.
You know, yesterday — I keep sidetracking or diverting myself, but the synapses here are firing at greater frequency than ever. Yesterday we had the caller who wanted to know how I would confront Millennials and young people and tell them that everything they know is not right, it’s wrong. And I went into this big explanation of what I would do, and I had a note right in front of me. During the commercial break I had scripted a note to make sure I included it, and I didn’t mention it.
And the reason why it’s nigh on impossible to do is because for two generations we have not taught critical thinking. We have people in this country who, by definition, are highly educated. By that I mean they’ve gone to college and they have degrees. We don’t know what they know, but by our definition they’re highly educated. They haven’t the slightest idea how to critically think. In fact, it might be useful to define critical thinking. Essentially curiosity, a willingness to not blindly accept what looks good, that buttresses what you think.
Just genuine curiosity, the ability to refute, the ability to think about what you believe so as to be able to refute arguments against you. That’s not taught. I think, by the way, that the lack of critical thinking is a major contributor into so many more millions of Americans buying into conspiracy theories.
Do you know what the latest big conspiracy theory is in the U.K.? Contrails. Do you know what a contrail is? It’s when a jet’s flying at high altitude and the exhaust from the engine creates what looks like clouds coming out of the back of the engine as the heat from the engine condenses with frozen air that high in the atmosphere, and you get a contrail. There’s a conspiracy that says that these contrails are designed to destroy the planet. Some people think they’re up there fighting climate change with these; others think that these are part of the effort to destroy the planet.
The ability to fall for something like that requires somebody not being able to think critically. Forget critically. Just think! I think the reason for that is that education has become indoctrination. There’s nothing about education that inspires learning. You know, critical thinking, curiosity is a huge part of it. The more you know, the more you want to know — and the more you hear, the more evidence for it you want to hear and have before you cement your belief system to it. That’s critical thinking.
Absent critical thinking, you will simply believe anything anybody says, particularly if it’s written down. If it’s written anywhere — if it’s written on the internet, if it’s written in the newspaper, if it’s written in a magazine — there’s a tendency to automatically believe it. And I think that’s what makes it difficult to persuade anybody — not just Millennials, but any number of people — who are not capable of independent thought, critical thinking or what have you. Here’s Chris Murphy answering Wolf Blitzer’s question: “Do you believe the attacker deliberately targeted this concert in Manchester ’cause it featured an American perform…?” They’re totally missing this. Here’s the answer.
Sen. Murphy Says Trump Rhetoric Could Lead to Terrorist Attack
MURPHY: I have not been briefed, uh, on this attack yet. Uh, all I know is that ISIS, uhh, has designs on bringing the fight to us here in the United States. Many of us are worried about some of the rhetoric of the Trump administration because we worry with that combined with robust online recruitment might end up in an attack like this happening in the United States.
RUSH: But wait. Wait a minute. People like this tell us that Islam’s a religion of peace, that there is no terrorism in Islam, and yet we can’t criticize Islam. If we criticize Islam we run the risk of offending them and as this clown from Connecticut just said, “Why, we might end up making them so mad that they join terror-action groups!” Another U.S. official yesterday said under testimony that terrorists becoming terrorists because they’re enslaved in poverty and prejudice. And none of that is true. Absolutely none of it is true.
There isn’t even a serious effort at the highest levels in European government (and even here) to actually learn about this — what it is, who they are, why they’re doing what they’re doing. When you simply politicize everything and you fall back on you’ve got a Republican president the Democrats hate. They think he stole the election. So he’s out there criticizing Islam and terrorism. “Oh, no! Oh, no! He can’t do that. That’s just gonna offend them and that’s just gonna cause more terrorism!”
That is clinically insane — and it’s not clinically insane, it’s downright stupid. It’s not even ignorant. It’s just downright dumb and stupid. If Islam is so peaceful, why is everybody so afraid and terrified to offend people? I mean, so much of this stuff just is thrown at us in utter defiance of common sense. Some of the examples we have here… Katy Perry has said some of the most ridiculous things. This was an attack on people who are not Islamic. This is all that’s going on. It has nothing to do with you’re Americans or British. It’s if you are a nonbeliever.
And for now, the Washington Post to think they’re on to something, that these guys might have a bias against women? Let’s see. We’ve got Boko Haram. We have the way women must dress. We have women being stoned and the Washington Post and the Drive-By Media still can’t figure it out. No, it takes a terror attack on a largely female-attended concert with a female performer before the lights start going off and they start considering the possibility that there might be some misogyny in militant Islamism. But let me get back to my setting-the-table theme here.
Back to the top. In April, we had an ISIS supporter attack in Paris on the Champs-Elysees, two weeks before the French elections. Remember? Then an ISIS supporter attacked the largest indoor arena in the U.K. a couple of weeks before their elections, which have been postponed, by the way.
Way too many people without independent thinking or a critical thought process.
Terrorism is not an enemy, it is a tactic.
You do not defeat tactics.
If the civilized world is to survive, Islam must be understood for what it really is: It’s not a religion, form of government, or anything recognizable to the civilized mind. Islam is a disease, an incurable disease of the mind that is highly contagious among the feeble minded and is now spreading among the world’s feeble minded at an epidemic rate. As with any disease, one can’t reason with this disease, negotiate with it, or treat in a manner other than how one would treat any other incurable disease.
As past efforts to contain this disease have failed, carriers of this Plague of Islam must be eradicated wherever they're found, for if they're not, this disease could eventually end not just Western Civilization, but it could undo over 5,000 years of human civilization.
A very important observation.
Agree, and one thing to be glad for in Canadian education is the new direction given by the Ministry of Education in my province is to stress critical thinking. (The same government however still embraces global warming crap, go figure).
And that is also the sort of thinking I try to encourage in my kids.
Heard Rush talking about this today.
Critical thinking is the practice of making judgements ( < Greek "kritikos" = "able to discern or judge" ) about what you read or hear. To do it, you need to know three things: grammar (how language is used to express thought), logic (how arguments are constructed), and rhetoric (how arguments are presented). These three subjects are what used to be called the Trivium — the "trivial" stuff you had to learn before you got into "real" subjects.
Nowadays, we have "outcome-based education" and "Common Core", meaning, everybody is educated (read: "trained") to come to the correct (read: "PC") conclusions without any idea how they got there, and especially with zero hint that other conclusions might be possible.
Our taxes at work....
In the present state of affairs it is case of the spiritually blind, leading the spiritually blind straight into the pit and unto destruction.
Concerning the actual, fundamental tenets of Islam, the masses and those leading and guiding them are wilfully ignorant and willingly being deceived and led by Satan, the "God of this world".
Superbly and succinctly said.
Outcome-based is a communist approach:
Equality (uniformity) of outcome, not equality of opportunity.
> "... And the reason why it’s nigh on impossible to do is because for two generations we have not taught critical thinking."
No, Rush -- the problem is that we've had two or three generations who have been taught "Critical Thinking" instead of Logic.
Rush does not understand that "Critical Thinking" is a brand name -- like "Kleenex" or "Xerox" -- for a branch of Outcomes-Based Education from the 1960s and 1970s.
It is not Logic or Reason -- "Critical Thinking" is to Logic what "New Math" is to Math or what "Ebonics" is to English Grammar.
Read this essay (scroll down):
http://www.sourcetext.com/grammarian/newslettersv07/7.3.htm
"Prometheus Rebound" by Richard Mitchell
The Underground Grammarian, vol. 7, no. 3, April 1983
If you don't want to believe me or Richard Mitchell, go ask the NEA. They love "Critical Thinking."
http://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
"Over the years it became clear that the framework was too long and complicated. To resolve this issue, we interviewed leaders of all kinds to determine which of the 21st century skills were the most important for K-12 education. There was near unanimity that four specific skills were the most important. They became known as the “Four Cs”: critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity."
http://greatpublicschools.nea.org/
"A good education inspires students’ natural curiosity, imagination, critical thinking skills and love of learning."
BEWARE OF "CRITICAL THINKING."
"Critical Thinking" is not Logic. "Critical Thinking" includes indoctrinating the student with "how did you feel about needing to throw Grandma off the Lifeboat because there wasn't enough room?" and things like that.
A Civilization Devoid of Common Sense Cannot Defeat ANYTHING!
Way too many people without independent thinking or a critical thought process.
Ya THINK!?!?
To do it, you need to know three things: grammar (how language is used to express thought), logic (how arguments are constructed), and rhetoric (how arguments are presented).
Not quite...
The things you read or hear have to be TRUE!!
And LOGIC only works when you are present with data that is TRUE!
Why are are astounded at the large crop of mushrooms after we've been fed crap for so long?
If all the things we read or heard were true, we wouldn't have to worry about critical thinking.
But in *this* world, we're being lied to from all sides. Besides, most lies are mostly truth anyway, otherwise they wouldn't be dangerous.
Critical thinking, in its proper form (not the "pasteurized process cheese food product substance substitute" that modern educationists are hawking under that label) is the tool with which you sift out the lies embedded inside the "mostly truth" that you read or hear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.