Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/19/2017 8:52:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

This whole entire thing is about setting up perjury traps, that is all. It is easy to step into one too.


2 posted on 05/19/2017 8:56:48 AM PDT by Paradox ("Donald Trump", the biggest Strawman ever created.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The RATs are in absolute panic mode. They HAVE to push this Russian thing because they say the firing of Comey as the possible start of a HUGE downfall of their empire.
Keep in mind, those howling the loudest, have the most corruption and the most to lose.
Roll on, Trump...ya got em pissin’ in their panty hose.


4 posted on 05/19/2017 9:02:36 AM PDT by lgjhn23 (It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What law says that a civilian has to report meeting with Russians, or any other people in the world?


7 posted on 05/19/2017 9:05:23 AM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Reuters reported on unmasked communications that included emails, text messages, and other contacts between team Trump and Russian nationals.

These unmasked communications were leaked to Reuters.

That’s a federal crime. And this is a witch hunt by deep state operatives and the hate-Trump media.


8 posted on 05/19/2017 9:06:56 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Questions for those in the know :

1) Is it illegal for a campaign to have contact with any foreign government ( e.g. Russia or China )?

2) Is the campaign required to disclose any such contact by law? If so, to whom?


11 posted on 05/19/2017 9:31:02 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

All of this activity sounds like it has it’s roots in 0bama’s favorite book “Rules for Radicals”.


12 posted on 05/19/2017 10:08:35 AM PDT by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
All this stuff is clearly revealing that the leftists are crazy. Their entire thought process is built on sand. It's crumbling before them.

One thing that no one has mentioned, is that Trump began educating himself on issues over a year in advance. I know a person who spent 6 hours with him on just one issue a year before the election. They are criticizing him for being prepared!

17 posted on 05/19/2017 11:36:39 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; GOPJ; stephenjohnbanker; sickoflibs; Liz; DoughtyOne

FBI allowed Clinton’s “forensics service” (not FBI forensics) to examine the DNC servers. Then, surprise surprise, “17 agencies agree it was the Russians.” What are the chances that Muller will ask why the FBI could not do the work? After all, he damn well should care if it was Seth Rich.


18 posted on 05/19/2017 12:32:59 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Why didn't the FBI examine DNC servers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The House and Senate Intelligence committees have also yet to find smoking guns relating to the collusion allegation.

That's because they're looking in the wrong places. If any collusion took place, it was in the Hillary campaign. We already know she sold favors to Russia for huge personal profit. It's not that much of a leap to assume she did collude with them to try to sway the election. All of this noise is not about Trump, it's about trying to distract attention from Hillary.

23 posted on 05/19/2017 7:01:47 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Let’s keep in mind that when people say that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to “hack” “meddle with” or otherwise change the outcome of the election, they are talking about releasing emails that revealed how corrupt and criminal the Democrats are, nothing more.


26 posted on 05/19/2017 7:41:06 PM PDT by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
And lest we lose sight of the REAL issue here...regardless of who leaked the DNC and Hilliary emails to WikiLeaks, they were legitimate emails - not invented or made up - that showed the lowdown dirty actions being taken by them to undermine rivals to HRC and her efforts to illegally hide State Department workings involving the Clinton Foundation. Whoever did the leaking, did America a FAVOR!
35 posted on 05/19/2017 11:15:22 PM PDT by boatbums (Authority has a way of descending to certitude, and certitude begets hubris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Contacts during the primary shouldn't matter because the election doesn't begin until the general election after the parties formally nominate their candidates.

-PJ

37 posted on 05/19/2017 11:25:10 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kremlin spokesman: Russian ambassador met with advisers to Clinton campaign too http://thehill.com/policy/international/323582-kremlin-spokesman-russian-ambassador-met-with-advisers-to-clinton

RussiaGate: Hillary Clinton and John Podesta’s Troubling Ties to Russia https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/03/29/russiagate-hillary-clinton-and-john-podestas-troubling-ties-to-russia/

This is all such a joke!


39 posted on 05/20/2017 8:37:55 AM PDT by EBH (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Why shouldn’t the coming administration meet with Russians?

I thought that the idea of a rapprochement with Putin’s government to subdue ISIS and advance matters of mutual interest was brilliant and creative.

And even if you disagree, isn’t it the President-elect’s job to create and advance foreign policy?


40 posted on 05/20/2017 8:44:00 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hmmm...”undisclosed” sounds suspicious. What does it mean?


43 posted on 05/20/2017 10:23:45 AM PDT by gogeo (When your life is based on a false premise...you are indeed insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson