Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

My only concern is that we keep the “know-how” U.S. based, so that we keep up with the latest tech and designs of this class of warship.

We need to pick up where things left off, if some of these relationships ever go South.

While this sounds like outsourcing, I wonder how much of it may in fact be our President tweaking our builders/suppliers in order to break loose some better deals design and cost-wise.


3 posted on 05/11/2017 10:32:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Part of the problem is that the Navy and most of America’s naval contractors put all their eggs in the now clearly failed LCS basket and the very troubled DD-X project. We no longer have any modern designs between the two ready to go and the modern threat picture is such that we do not have time to start from scratch and retrain people to design a new one.


5 posted on 05/11/2017 10:59:35 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Back in the seventies I used to see a number of Naval frigates in the US stockpile. I had heard later that the use of frigates by the US Navy was a stopgap type of a program until the Arleigh Burke class destroyers came out. But I’m not sure if that’s accurate.


14 posted on 05/12/2017 4:02:51 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its noodle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson