Wanna bet how this goes?
Ordinarily a recusal would be in order but it’s the minth
As I recall the criticism of the judge wasn’t his Mexican heritage, it was his Mexicanist activism.
What documentation is needed to explain the legality of sending a Mexican citizen who is in our country illegally back to Mexico? Deport the criminal and bar him for life from reentry into our country. One more down. Twelve million (or more) to go.
To set the record straight, Trump didn’t attack this judge for his Mexican heritage. He criticized the judge because he was a member of La Raza type organizations....in other words, sympathetic to Mexican insurgency in the US.
I would say he is well on his way to becoming a law abiding, taxpaying citizen. NOT.
Court records show he has four convictions: one for shoplifting in January 2016, and three for driving without a license, most recently three months ago.
Either you enforce immigration laws and secure the border or through judicial fiat legitimize the “reconquesta” and transform the culture. Few doubts on how this judge views his “duty”.
Geez, even when Obama lets them skirt the law they still can’t follow the rules. It used to be a visa holder popped at the border could have his visa revoked right there.
No dreamer, the responsibility is on you to prove your citizenship.
Maybe Trump wasn’t in love with him because this judge was a member of an organization which stated in a press release that they were going to target the Trump business interests!
I have lost confidence that anything is 'random'. We are being lied to by everyone all the time. I no have to reason to think this is the truth. It is a set up.
Deport this la raza judge, too.
judge should recuse himself...
Thanks (comment #1) , that is the most detailed description I have read here, the other posts didn’t add up.
Where did you get/here this from?
What about the claim that his DACA status had expired due to time?
I find it hard to debate libs on stuff like this unless I have a story that adds up.
I recall that President Trump canceled the EO for DAPA but has not yet for DACA, preferring to review DACA persons on a case-by-case basis.
That’s very generous of President Trump.
DAPA is for illegal parents of ‘children’ born in the US or allegedly brought in as minors.
DACA is for illegal ‘children’ who were allegedly brought in as minors, ‘Dreamers’.
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is an Obama immigration policy by Executive Order made in June 2012 so conveniently during the election campaign. DACA persons or ‘Dreamers’ say they entered the country as minors. Maybe they did, maybe they did not. They only need state they did to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and eligibility for a work permit.
This so-called ‘Dreamer’ that the President has ordered removed is thus under a two-year ‘renewable’ deferred action policy that is executive branch policy and is not a law of the United States, a policy executed by the White House having nothing to do with the judicial branch of the United States.
The Trump Administration is able to move to strike this illegal’s complaint. There are no grounds for habeas corpus because the President has absolute constitutional authority over matters of movement of non-citizens and non-residents inside the United States and its territories. The courts have no jurisdiction.
I foresee grounds for impeaching the judge.
another difference with immigrants...
a green card holder doesn’t sneak in and out of our country...
he or she can walk, drive, fly, bus, etc through a border check point using a passport and the green card...
as long as they don’t stay gone for more than 365 days theyre good...
I went to Europe for 4 months when I was a green card holder...
coming back you do have to go in the line for non-citizens for customs, but you already have permission to enter as an immigrant...
there’s so much more to this story since he repeatedly entered illegally AFTER getting DACA...
well for 1. His DACA had expired and he couldn’t get it renewed...
that is a big glaring reason to deport him...he was only allowed to stay and not be deported while he was DACA...hes not that at present...
be interesting to see what this judge does...
The case goes in front of Gonzalo “El Caudillo de Mexico” Curiel?
Forget it. Might as well be in front of the Mexican Supreme Court. He’ll pat him on the head and say, “Pobrecito”, and issue a scathing order against the government for having the temerity to enforce any law against him.
DACA is not law. It is something dreamed up by Obama to protect illegal aliens from our laws in direct violation of the oath of office to faithfully execute the laws.
It must be ended.
It is still an illegal program.