Skip to comments.
Judge Curiel, Once Criticized by Trump, Gets Deported ‘Dreamer’ Case
NBC News ^
| Apr 20 2017, 8:01 am ET
| Phil Helsel
Posted on 04/20/2017 5:30:36 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
A federal lawsuit brought by a so-called "Dreamer" deported to Mexico has been assigned to District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel the jurist famously attacked by then-candidate Donald Trump over his "Mexican heritage" in a separate case involving Trump University.
Judge Gonzalo Curiel US District Court Southern District of California
Juan Manuel Montes, 23, filed a complaint Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging that the government did not provide any documentation explaining the legality of sending him back to Mexico. The suit seeks documents related to his case.
The case was assigned at random to Curiel, the Indiana-born judge whose impartiality was called into question by Trump last year due to what the then-candidate called Curiel's "Mexican heritage."
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; curiel; dreamer; dreamers; first100days; judiciary; laraza; trump45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
I learned a few things about this "DREAMer" this morning:
- He's crossed the border on his own several times. According to the law, DREAMers are supposed to notify the authorities before doing that to get authorization. Reasons include things like visiting a sick relative.
- DREAMer Manuel Montes never sought, nor received authorization in any of his crossings
- The penalty for crossing the border without seeking authorization is immediate revocation of your DREAMER privileges.
- During this last crossing in February, he was caught by Border Patrol jumping a fence. During the Obama Administration, the ROE was to just let Montes go. No longer.
- Montes has a criminal record, including charges of driving without a license.
To: COBOL2Java
Wanna bet how this goes?
Ordinarily a recusal would be in order but it’s the minth
2
posted on
04/20/2017 5:33:57 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: COBOL2Java
As I recall the criticism of the judge wasn’t his Mexican heritage, it was his Mexicanist activism.
3
posted on
04/20/2017 5:34:19 AM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Nifster
Ordinarily a recusal would be in order... Why?
To: COBOL2Java
The case was assigned at random to Curiel
Uhhh, yeah. That is something I am going to believe.
5
posted on
04/20/2017 5:35:12 AM PDT
by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: COBOL2Java
What documentation is needed to explain the legality of sending a Mexican citizen who is in our country illegally back to Mexico? Deport the criminal and bar him for life from reentry into our country. One more down. Twelve million (or more) to go.
6
posted on
04/20/2017 5:35:48 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: COBOL2Java
To set the record straight, Trump didn’t attack this judge for his Mexican heritage. He criticized the judge because he was a member of La Raza type organizations....in other words, sympathetic to Mexican insurgency in the US.
7
posted on
04/20/2017 5:37:16 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
To: COBOL2Java
Three convictions for driving without a license. One conviction for shoplifting.
I would say he is well on his way to becoming a law abiding, taxpaying citizen. NOT.
To: wbarmy
Uhhh, yeah. That is something I am going to believe. Yep!
9
posted on
04/20/2017 5:37:38 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
To: Nifster
Wanna bet how this goes?The only question is how much money taxpayers will be awarding Montes for being inconvenienced.
10
posted on
04/20/2017 5:37:54 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Nifster
The curious Curiel. A struggle lies ahead.
11
posted on
04/20/2017 5:38:42 AM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: DoodleDawg
Why? Judge Curiel is tight with La Raza.
12
posted on
04/20/2017 5:39:44 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
To: COBOL2Java
Montes has a criminal record, including charges of driving without a license.Court records show he has four convictions: one for shoplifting in January 2016, and three for driving without a license, most recently three months ago.
13
posted on
04/20/2017 5:40:57 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: COBOL2Java
Either you enforce immigration laws and secure the border or through judicial fiat legitimize the “reconquesta” and transform the culture. Few doubts on how this judge views his “duty”.
To: Pollster1
"What documentation is needed to explain the legality of sending a Mexican citizen who is in our country illegally back to Mexico?"
Citizen, you ask such foolish questions. I have two more: What standing does a non-citizen residing in another country have in a US court? Are his lawyers arguing that a non-citizen who has been deported and resides outside the US has constitutional rights?
To: COBOL2Java
Geez, even when Obama lets them skirt the law they still can’t follow the rules. It used to be a visa holder popped at the border could have his visa revoked right there.
16
posted on
04/20/2017 5:43:22 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: COBOL2Java
Juan Manuel Montes, 23, filed a complaint Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging that the government did not provide any documentation explaining the legality of sending him back to Mexico. No dreamer, the responsibility is on you to prove your citizenship.
17
posted on
04/20/2017 5:43:55 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: allendale
The former illegal alien invader should be sued for having the gall to invade this country. Shoot him if he shows in court.
18
posted on
04/20/2017 5:45:42 AM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
To: COBOL2Java
19
posted on
04/20/2017 5:46:01 AM PDT
by
Dana1960
To: COBOL2Java
The case was assigned at random to CurielI have lost confidence that anything is 'random'. We are being lied to by everyone all the time. I no have to reason to think this is the truth. It is a set up.
20
posted on
04/20/2017 5:46:11 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson