Supreme Court won't hear case challenging government's expedited removal of undocumented immigrants

CNN ^ | 4/17/2017 | Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter

[mdittmar]

(CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion rejecting claims by undocumented Central American women and children -- who were apprehended immediately after arriving in the country without authorization -- seeking asylum.

Lawyers for the families sought to challenge their expedited removal proceedings in federal court arguing they face gender-based violence at home, but a Philadelphia-based federal appeals court held that they have no right to judicial review of such claims.

The court's action means the government can continue to deny asylum seekers placed in expedited removal a chance to have their cases heard by federal court.

[mdittmar]

Justice Neil Gorsuch,who has his first full week on the court starting Monday, did not participate in the decision.

Well,here's an old song I like;)

Ernest Tubb - In The Jailhouse Now (Live)

[umgud]

This is good newz.

[Lurker]

Not tired of winning yet.

L

[oldplayer]

The “rule of law” still has a faint heartbeat.

[oldplayer]

The “rule of law” still has a faint heartbeat.

[SoFloFreeper]

A good omen?

[SoFloFreeper]

Winning. Not even tired.

[eyeamok]

“We conclude that Congress may, consonant with the Constitution, deny habeas review in federal court of claims relating to an alien’s application for admission to the country, at least as to aliens who have been denied initial entry

And this is exactly why President Trump should have told the rogue Judges to go Pound Sand and COngress should have immediately IMPEACHED those rogue Judges for even Hearing those Cases on his Executive Order.

CONGRESS has already Denied the Inferior Courts from Hearing cases regarding Aliens through Legislation. The 3rd Circuit actually Read It!!!

[Pilgrim's Progress]

Hey liberals! You feelin’ blue? Ya feelin’ outnumbered???

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!

WINNING hasn’t been so good since the 1980’s umgud!

[umgud]

Amen brother.

[Ciexyz]

Wow.

[ronnie raygun]

So the rotten American stinking lawyers claim they face gender-based violence at home. IS THIS YOUR PROBLEM IS THIS MY PROBLEM......NO IT IS THERE PROBLEM!

[Liz]

PING

[SanchoP]

There is a law that has been on the books forever that anything within 150 miles of the border is considered the border so the mojados can be photographed/fingerprinted and deported immediately.
Barry ignored this law but now the good guys are in charge.

[hsmomx3]

I think Mr. Gorsuch has been a great choice and I am sure the libs are reeling right now.

[Pilgrim's Progress]

When we tell a liberal that it is not a problem . . . what we mean is that it isn’t ‘our’ problem!

[DoughtyOne]

It’s so seldom we win one of these things in court, I’m amazed.

Give it three or four years and we’ll be winning them all the time as Trump’s appointees come on line.

At the end of eight years..., wow. Can’t wait.

After Pence’s 16 years, just imagine.

[DoughtyOne]

Oops... Pence’s eight years.

Keep thinking in terms of 16 years, Trump/Pence.

[FlingWingFlyer]

This isn’t the Supreme Court’s business. They need to stay the hell out of it. Enforcement of our laws belongs to the Executive Branch.

[Magnum44]

NO IT IS THERE PROBLEM!

I am not the spelling police. I make enough mistakes of my own, but I try not to do it in all CAPS. LOL