Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Sends More Warships Toward Syria Following U.S. Tomahawk Strikes
USNI ^ | 10 Apr 2017 | Sam LaGrone

Posted on 04/11/2017 1:28:36 PM PDT by RitchieAprile

A Russian Navy surface action group is headed to the Eastern Mediterranean departing shortly after a U.S. Tomahawk missile strike on a Syrian airfield, a U.S. defense official told USNI News on Monday.

Two Steregushchiy-class corvettes, an ocean tug and a fleet oiler departed from the naval base in the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad on Saturday bound for the Eastern Mediterranean and likely Syria, the official told USNI News.

The ships from the Russian Navy’s Baltic Fleet are set to arrive in the next several days off the coast of Syria.

The Russian SAG will join the guided missile frigate Admiral Grigorovich that sortied from the Black Sea on Friday after a nine-day resupply period.

Steregushchiy-class corvettes are among the more modern Russian ships – constructed in the early 2000s — with some versions of the ship capable of fielding the Russian Kalibir NK long range land attack cruise missiles. The Russians have used the weapon – with similar ranges of U.S. Tomahawks – as part of combined Russian and al-Assad loyal forces campaign against rebels in Aleppo fired from Admiral Grigorovich.

The 2,200-ton guided missile corvettes are, “designed for operations in adjacent maritime zones, fighting enemy surface ships and submarines, as well as to provide naval gunfire support for amphibious landings,” according to a U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence report.

The both the SAG and Admiral Grigorovich left their homeports shortly after U.S. guided missile destroyers USS Ross (DDG-71) and USS Porter (DDG-78) launched 59 Tomahawk missiles targeting the al-Shayrat airfield, the alleged base from which Syrian Su-22s conducted an April 4 chemical weapon strike against civilians Khan Sheikhoun. The U.S. determined the strike was conducted by forces loyal to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

“The assessment of the Department of Defense is that the strike resulted in the damage or destruction of fuel and ammunition sites, air defense capabilities, and 20 percent of Syria’s operational aircraft,” read a Monday statement from U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis. ”The Syrian government has lost the ability to refuel or rearm aircraft at Shayrat airfield and at this point, use of the runway is of idle military interest. The Syrian government would be ill-advised ever again to use chemical weapons.”

Porter and Ross are part of the U.S. Navy’s four-ship forward deployed destroyer force based in Rota, Spain. While the ships are primarily focused on regional ballistic missile defense, they have also been employed for presence operations in the U.S European Command and U.S. Africa Command.

Having the forward deployed assets already in the Mediterranean accelerated the U.S. response to the April 4 attack, Pentagon officials told USNI News last week.

“These platforms provide an option for the leadership for a measured and deliberate strike. That’s their value,” Capt. Paul Stader – former commander of USS Hue City (CG-66) and Ross — told USNI News on Friday. “[Tomahawks] are very short notice and are capable of executing within a very tight timeline. They’ve evolved over the years that we’ve had them in the inventory and they’re a very capable option for leadership if we want them.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: russianavy; trumprussia; trumpsyria

1 posted on 04/11/2017 1:28:36 PM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
an ocean tug

Not a ringing endorsement of reliability of Russian ships even relatively new ones.

2 posted on 04/11/2017 1:31:26 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

The Kuznetsov almost needed that tug...

3 posted on 04/11/2017 1:33:48 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
Two Steregushchiy-class corvettes, an ocean tug and a fleet oiler departed from the naval base in the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad on Saturday bound for the Eastern Mediterranean and likely Syria, the official told USNI News.

Wow. Really pulling out the big guns I see. So advanced and modern they're sending a tug.

4 posted on 04/11/2017 1:35:44 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Sitting ducks!


5 posted on 04/11/2017 1:36:03 PM PDT by t4texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

A weak move on Putin’s Part—but More to come I am sure.


6 posted on 04/11/2017 1:37:53 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Yes. Same thought here.

Now if they’re all following in a straight line behind it, bwa ha ha ha ha...


7 posted on 04/11/2017 1:38:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

So... essentially 3 frigates, a tug, and and oiler?????

LOLOLOLOL!!!!


8 posted on 04/11/2017 1:46:10 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

"You hear that Linds?! Hot damn! Gladiator movies tonight!!!"


9 posted on 04/11/2017 1:56:15 PM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Russia will have a few Fake Chemical attacks to try to draw Trump in , but Trump has already been there and done that and moved on


10 posted on 04/11/2017 1:58:04 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Bringing checkers to a chess match . . . I love it!


11 posted on 04/11/2017 2:04:00 PM PDT by t4texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Chairman Mike Rogers just spent 30 minutes explaining that Putin wants an end to all this. Not popular back home. Rogers said on WMAL that Putin will “scream bloody murder” publicly but to Trump and Tillerson, he’s saying, “let’s talk.” Same with China, basically.


12 posted on 04/11/2017 2:05:29 PM PDT by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

If we are talking about a clash of Navies then it is the ships that you can’t see that really matter. The rest are all just targets.


13 posted on 04/11/2017 2:15:00 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

There was a time that would be really bad and the reaction would be difficult.
But Trump could give them a much bigger scare to Russia than even a nuclear strike

* we’re going to undo all of Obama’s drilling/gas/carbon EOs
* we’re going to DRILL, DRILL, DRILL (and export)
* we’re going to help Mexico Drill, Drill, Drill,
* we’re going to help Canada get their oil to China and the world (and drill, drill, drill)

Russia wants high oil prices first, then access to oil-buyers/pipelines/ports. Stopping buyers is politically difficult at best (US EXXON will get the cheapest oil from anywhere). Destroying pipelines and ports is a military difficulty or disaster in these areas. If we kill prices, their other objective are meaningless.

Israel’s foes are also funded almost exclusively by oil profits. And they influence other Israel-haters with oil prices (much of the UN is anti-Isreal because oil price threats) . Hurting them and influencing Russia depends on either
* producing more oil from other countries (e.g. US, Canada,...)
* increasing green energy production technology by 2-3 orders of magnitude. It may take 4 and 4-5 orders of magnitude for storage.

Right now, there is no technology that will hurt oil producers. So our best option is driving their profits down by flooding the market with our energy - drill, drill, drill.


14 posted on 04/11/2017 2:31:40 PM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The Russians can glare at the US destroyers with mean faces while their tug pulls them around. ;)


15 posted on 04/11/2017 3:52:45 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

It’s actually quite funny, but the implications are real.

I think this is bluster.

Besides, it looks like Putin thought his advisors said, “Show of farce...”


16 posted on 04/11/2017 4:06:29 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson