The parents raised £1.2 million to treat their child, but aren't even allowed to spend their own money.
To: nickcarraway
Gotta be “FAIR” to everyone since the government is paying for it. And this is perfect government speak.
” Charlie’s best interests that I find it is in Charlie’s best interests “
Sorry Charlie. For your own sake we are going to kill you.
2 posted on
04/11/2017 11:02:16 AM PDT by
Organic Panic
(Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
To: nickcarraway
Government health ‘care’: killing you when convenient.
3 posted on
04/11/2017 11:03:07 AM PDT by
Regulator
To: nickcarraway
6 posted on
04/11/2017 11:08:21 AM PDT by
Dante3
To: nickcarraway
With that kind of money, couldn’t they just move him to another country?
To: nickcarraway
Another example of what progressivism/being pro-death leads to.
8 posted on
04/11/2017 11:09:38 AM PDT by
TheStickman
(And their fear tastes like sunshine puked up by unicorns.)
To: nickcarraway
People wonder why Pro-life people should not give an inch. It is indeed a slippery downhill slope.
10 posted on
04/11/2017 11:13:59 AM PDT by
Tammy8
(Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
To: nickcarraway
How can a judge prevent parents getting care for their child using private money? Anyone got a link to the ruling?
18 posted on
04/11/2017 11:34:13 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
To: nickcarraway; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker; KC_Lion; ...
Sickening nanny state MFers. These judges think they are Gods, doctors do too.
21 posted on
04/11/2017 9:53:16 PM PDT by
Impy
(End the kritarchy!)
To: nickcarraway
28 posted on
06/08/2017 2:13:32 PM PDT by
thesearethetimes...
(Had I brought Christ with me, the outcome would have been different. Dr.Eric Cunningham)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson