All too common at lib institutions.
For these suits to be effective, they have to name as individuals the people who actually made the definitive decision to violate the civil rights of the individual. When individual administrators start accumulating legalcosts and damages, their behavior will change dramatically.
Any male student in ANY of America’s colleges should recognize that he is in a hostile Feminazi bureaucratic and legal environment that will hang him even if he does nothing wrong. Safest approach is to have no intimate or sexual contacts at all. Or else, have a written consent form .... but even that would probably be inadequate protection when these Feminazis go to work on him.
Also, don’t talk with or hang out with female students, since you never know how something you say may be twisted or misconstrued as “harassment” or “insensitive”....
That part of the state (it's called "Happy Valley" by a local Boston talk host) is about as Marxist as you'll find here and,IMO,if he was prosecuted there's a real chance he'd be convicted...regardless of how flimsy the evidence.
Just sayin'....
I have an old friend that is an Amherst Grsd.
He is now embarrassed by their being
The real agenda:
1. All hetero sex is rape
2. All gay sex is legit
Any questions?
Regret rape.
Her room was available because her roommate—Doe’s girlfriend—was away.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ENTIRE story right there..
JDoes GF came home, found something of Does in HER shared room, confronts roommate, roommate claims Doe looking for GF, assaulted her instead.
Hence a ‘bond’ was formed between the 2 feminazis and from there forward, J DOE never stood a chance EVEN if a tape showed she ‘attacked’ him, the evil man was going down (well, taking a fall)
Oooops!
At least she wasn't killed in a kiln explosion.
If it had been an Syrian foreign exchange student — or better yet, a Syrian “refugee” — and the crime had been actual forceable rape in broad daylight in front of multiple witness... there never would have been any charges filed at all. And if there were, they would have been instantly dismissed on the grounds of “culture”.
”One way is its Title IX madness, …"
"… the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)."
To the best of my understanding of the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers, the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the corrupt feds the specific power to make either Title IX, or to establish the Education Department, corrections, insights welcome.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
I surmise that corrupt career politicians must support Title IX and the Education Department to win votes from low-information citizens who have never been taught the fed’s constitutionally limited powers.
Also consider that the low-information administrators and faculty who run probably most the nation’s schools must be scared of being threatened with the loss of unaccountable, unconstitutional federal funding if they do not comply with the fed’s unconstitutional policies.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
Regarding Title IX, the only forms of discrimination that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect all deal with voting rights, evidenced by the 15th, 19th and 26th Amendments. But since the issue of this thread addresses discrimination issues that are clearly outside the scope of voting rights, the feds have no constitutional authority to get involved in this INTRAstate schooling issues imo.
Regarding the Education Department, note that President Thomas Jefferson had indicated that the states would need to appropriately amend the Constitution in order for the feds to regulate, make policy, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate schooling issues. But it remains that the states have never amended the Constitution for federal involvement in intrastate education.
On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression in due season will doubtless be right, but the great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphases added]” —Thomas Jefferson : Sixth Annual Message to Congress
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch is approved but turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed above.