Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gamecock; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; campaignPete R-CT

F the fillbuster, it violates the will of the majority, it’s not in the constitution it’s a rule that never should have existed.

Dems will block everything so we really ought to get rid of it all together, otherwise nothing will pass that can’t be done via filibuster immune “reconciliation”.


47 posted on 04/07/2017 11:25:50 AM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Impy; Gamecock; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; campaignPete R-CT

I think there’s something to be said for the Senate moving deliberately on legislation. I would require 60 votes for cloture on the first cloture vote, but reduce the threshold to 59 after two weeks, to 58 after two more weeks, etc., until only 50 votes are required for cloture after 20 weeks. So the most that 49 senators could do is delay a bill for five months, sort of like the House of Lords used to be able to do in the UK.


49 posted on 04/07/2017 2:29:02 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson