Posted on 04/04/2017 1:06:07 PM PDT by Helicondelta
If former National Security Advisor Susan Rice though she could get away from the current furore over the Trump "unmasking" scandal with just one MSNBC interview in which Andrea Mitchell did not even ask her why she lied two weeks ago to PBS, she will be disappointed as moments ago Dow Jones reported that the House Intelligence Panel has asked Susan Rice to testify, supposedly under oath.
HOUSE INTELLIGENCE PANEL ASKS SUSAN RICE TO TESTIFY, DJ SAYS The next question on everyone's lips: will she plead the Fifth?
As a reminder, earlier in the day, the MSNBC anchor asked Susan Rice if she would testify before congress as Rand Paul requested, Rice responded by changing the subject to Russia.
"Rand Paul is suggesting that you be subpoenaed to testify. Would you be willing to go to Capitol Hill?" Mitchell asked.
"You know, Andrea, let's, let's… see what comes," she said. "Umm, I'm not going, ahh, you know, sit here and prejudge, but what I will say is that the investigations that are underway as to the Russian involvement in our electoral process are very important and they're very serious. Every American ought to have an interest in those investigations going wherever the evidence indicates they should."
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
Yeah....love it.
Of course she’ll plead the fifth....
Agree or some BS it was all about National Security defense and never shared/used for political purposes
What if one or several government employees flip for immunity? That could lead to a stampede! ...
Oh, I see....you trust the ‘lottery’ process.
—
Right on. Kind of like believing Hillary REALLY won all those coin tosses during the RAT primaries.
That is the way I think too.Hillary clinton is an absolute criminal and Chaffetz bull shit got no damned where. The place for criminal prosecution is in the Court House, not the House office building. I am beginning to think this is just a big show while our civil rights are stripped away y the good old boy power elites and I’m sick of it.
What is wrong with firing squad?
“Prediction: “Immunity” “National security” etc.”
Then Hillary/Obama/Soros et al, put a bullet in her head....
I didn’t mean to sound jerky about it but top RATs are facing 3-4 totally seperate investigations each since ValJar didn’t evenly spread culpability: she sent the same minions up to take the arrows in lots of scandals.
From here on in, expect *every* cheat in the book to keep them selves out of nooses, as HRC noted.
Chicken coop. Bwock obama. I crack myself up.
Nothing will come of it. Why?
Well, she’s a black female RAT.
1. RATs don’t get indicted or prosecuted. IF they did, there’d be no more RATs as they’re all crooks.
2. High-end blacks don’t get indicted or prosecuted. IF they did, there’d be no more high-end blacks as they’re all crooks.
3. High-end females don’t get indicted or prosecuted. IF they did, there’d be no more Hillary, Lerner, Lynch, etc. as they’re all crooks.
Those that have the power to indict and prosecute the above criminals do NOT have the balls to do it. I thought Trump did, but now I’m beginning to have serious doubts. Sessions is a pussy cat, not a bull dog. We need a bull dog.
Consider that her hand is in the cookie jar which she does not deny it sounds more like she wants to switch the subject..
Here is her answer to the question regarding “you were responsible for leaking the fact that Mike Flynn had talked to ambassador”
“I can’t get into any specifical course I don’t know what Devin Nunes reviewed at the White House what I can say there is an established process for senor national security officials to ask for the identity of US persons in these reports anything beyond that is to disclose classified information and those people that are doing that
are doing something that is very wrong.”
Seems to me she sounds defensive and otherwise as a national security official she would be very concerned about the very wrong leaks and express a cooperative attitude about the investigation.
“asks” ?????
SJB: Then Hillary/Obama/Soros et al, put a bullet in her head....
D1: ...and not necessarily in that order...
YEP
“:^)
One ordel of flied lice comin’ up, Charlie!
She might be figuring out a way to pin this on Ben Rhodes.
She will plead the 5th, if she appears at all. You read it here.
will the Kenyan be called to testify?
Judge Napolitano on if Susan Rice did anything illegal
18 U.S. Code § 1001 - Statements or entries generally
903. False Statements, Concealment—18 U.S.C. § 1001
All over the internet Hannity was surveilled and unmasked. Opens up the possibility of huge civil lawsuits against Obama, Rice, Brennan, Hillary and anyone associated with the surveillance, unmasking and leaking. Sekulow just said he would represent Sean. Fight On!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.