Pete was obviously displeased with the Donald.
She’s a Democrat and frequent guest on Judge J’s show.
Startling admission.
The key to all of this is the Atlantic Council. The vehemently anti-russian think tank that Dr. Farkas is a senior fellow.
Most people think that the FBI analyzed the DNC servers and came to the conclusion based on their analysis that Russia hacked the DNC. That is not true. The DNC refused to let the FBI look at their servers. Instead the DNC hired a private company, Crowdstrike, to do an analysis of their servers. It was Crowdstrike that concluded that Russia hacked the DNC. They then turned over those findings to the FBI.
If this sounds incredibly shady its because it is. While private companies do such analysis its very odd that in a case where national security is involved that FBI/CIA analysts were not allowed to do their own analysis of the evidence. This isn’t someone hacking card readers at a McDonald’s. This is a hack of the DNC during the presidential campaign. That the FBI was not allowed to look at the servers is unconscionable. It sounds eerily similar to the Duke lacrosse rape case. Nifong didn’t let the state forensic office analyze the evidence. Instead he hired a private company to do it and that componay found what Nifong wanted them to find.
So what do we know about Crowdstrike? Well Crowdstrike was founded by Dmitri Alperovitch, a Ukrainian National, who just like Dr. Farkas is a fellow at, you guessed it, Atlantic Council. So we have one senior fellow at this think tank pushing for the administration to get and desiminate everything they can on a Trump/Russia connection and we have this other senior fellow at the Atlantic council Dmitri Alperovitch establishing the case that it was Russia that hacked the DNC.
Now answer me this. I’m sure Crowdstrike has a good reputation in most circumstances, but can a company founded by a vehemently anti-Russian Ukrainian, who is a member of this vehemently anti-Russian think tank, be trusted to do a fair unbiased analysis when there is a question of Russian involvement?
if crowdstrike is anti-russian, what was it doing supporting obama-hillary nexus when hillary benefited from the russian uranium deal?
Who in their right mind would trust anything a Democrat had to say...
We'll give Sausage-Fest Boy some astronaut pants for the dance, so he doesn't embarrass himself...
Matches up with the Farkas timeline.
Why do I have a feeling that we’ll find out Trump was not the only person under surveillance?
Then it’s only logical that Jeb, Cruz, Rubio, and other GOP candidates were also under Obama administration wire taps.
Both videos dated March 4 2017
6:11 Minutes at 4:30 min mark Mary Ann Marsh
Judge Jeanine Pirro -Pres Trump Accuses Pres Obama Of Tapping His Phones Campaign Inside Trump Tower
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejrSMW5Tm6U
5:39 Minutes Part 2 Just after the 5 min mark Mary Ann Marsh repeats it
Judge Jeanine Pirro - Pres Trump Accuses Obama Of Tapping His Phones Campaign Inside Trump Tower
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_mpKVCVmBE
Russian Conspiracy theory ping.
Russian Conspiracy theory ping.
Mary Marsh back in 2013 : http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3059974/posts