Skip to comments.
NOT backing down: Freedom Caucus stands strong amid attacks from the President
Conservative Review ^
| 03/31/2017
| Chris Pandolfo
Posted on 03/31/2017 8:44:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Though the Freedom Caucus is under assault from all sides, some of its members who have spoken to the media or made public statements are standing strong — insisting that they are willing to work with President Trump to keep the GOP’s promise to repeal Obamacare.
The media has used the failure of the American Health Care Act — Republican leadership’s phony repeal bill — as an excuse to attack conservatives in Congress. The Tea Party members of the Freedom Caucus, who opposed the legislation on grounds that it would not improve the American health insurance market, have been labeled “hardliners” who are unwilling to “compromise” or “get things done.”
President Trump has expressed his frustration with the health insurance bill’s failure in a series of tweets, first suggesting that the Freedom Caucus saved Planned Parenthood funding and Obamacare, and later announcing that if conservatives don’t hop aboard the establishment Republican agenda they will be fought in 2018.
“The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don't get on the team, & fast. We must fight them, & Dems, in 2018!” the president tweeted.
Some members of the House Freedom Caucus are pushing back on President Donald Trump’s threat to “fight” conservatives in the 2018 midterm primary elections.
"It didn't take long for the swamp to drain [Trump]. No shame, Mr. President. Almost everyone succumbs to the D.C. Establishment," Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) tweeted.
Freedom Caucus ally Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) also joined in.
So did Rep. Labrador:
Other Freedom Caucus conservatives are being less confrontational. Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) reiterated his support for “actual repeal” of Obamacare, and said he shared the president’s “frustration” with recalcitrant Republicans in Washington D.C.
"The Freedom Caucus is trying to change Washington. This bill keeps Washington the same, plain and simple," Rep. Jordan said on Fox News Thursday.
"We appreciate the president; we are trying to help the president. But the fact is, you have to look at the legislation. It doesn't do what we told the voters we were going to do, and the American people understand that. That's why only 17 percent of the population supports this legislation."
“We want to help the president get a bill that rises above 17% in the polling,” Congressman Dave Brat (R-Va.) told Conservative Review. He said the Freedom Caucus is looking for a bill that will lower premiums by repealing the insurance regulations and mandated health benefits that are driving up the cost of health insurance.
Brat also criticized the mainstream media narrative that the Freedom Caucus sunk Obamacare repeal. “The narrative by the elites and the D.C. cronies and the mainstream media is that ‘we can’t get to yes.’”
“On the facts that’s false,” Brat said. “We voted ‘yes’ 50 times for repeal. And the 2015 bill was unanimous, basically, with Republicans in the House and the Senate.”
Rep. Brat argues that the Freedom Caucus has compromised from voting for that 2015 full repeal of Obamacare to nearly supporting the American Health Care Act, “kind of an Obamacare federal structure that maintains the basic architecture of Obamacare.”
This is not what the conservative base in the Republican Party voted for in 2016. Then again, actually it is.
“The idea that we haven’t moved considerably is just laughable,” Brat said.
Further, “it was clear to Leadership that more moderates were going to vote no if that bill came to the floor than the Freedom Caucus. But that narrative is not as convenient. Once that vote hit 22 ‘Noes’ it was going to go to 60 or 70, is the best estimate.”
Why then are moderates like Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Il.) claiming the Freedom Caucus killed Obamacare repeal?
“They’re just being politically shrewd,” Brat said. “The mainstream media, of course, goes along with that narrative that it's these conservative guys’ fault. It’s the usual D.C. narrative.”
A narrative that President Trump has bought into. But Freedom Caucus conservatives aren’t the only ones making Brat’s point.
Congressman Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) — who is not a member of the Freedom Caucus — told PJ media that “there were probably ten to fifteen members of the Freedom Caucus that were still a no.” However, Emmer estimated that there were “two-thirds to three-quarters of the Freedom Caucus [who] were yes on this bill.” A “vast majority.”
This media narrative blaming the Freedom Caucus is “intentional,” Emmer said.
It always has been this way. You've got to marginalize the conservatives as much as possible. I think this is done both by liberals on the Left as much as liberals on the Right, Walter. The more you can marginalize this group, the less influence they can have, right?...
Marginalizing conservatives is exactly what the moderate Republicans in the Tuesday Group have decided to do. Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.), who was the first member of Congress to endorse President Trump, told reporters today that the Freedom Caucus no longer has a seat at the table for negotiations on legislation.
These moderate Republicans refused to go along with a full repeal of Obamacare, and now they are pledging to work with liberal Democrats to pass bad bills rather than use the Republican majority to pass conservative legislation.
It’s compromise with Democrats. Screw the conservatives. Pass liberal legislation that will hurt people. And President Trump is fine with all of it.
This is not what the conservative base in the Republican Party voted for in 2016. Then again, actually it is. The Tea Party took this risk when they handed Trump the Republican nomination in 2016. Donald Trump was never a conservative. He was never anti-establishment.
Some conservatives knew that when they held their nose to beat Hillary Clinton.
Well, the Democrats are out of power and conservatives are still losing. So where do we go from here?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: boohoo; conservativereview; cultists; fakes; freedomcaucus; healthcare; marklevin; nevertrump; obamacare; populists; reeeeeee; ryancarebillpulled; trumpfreedomcaucus; whining; wofc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: SeekAndFind
If Justin Amash had gotten his way Trump would have cut and run last October, and Hillary would be president. He would probably love it since he could posture as a pure conservative and not have any responsibility to actually accomplish anything real.
2
posted on
03/31/2017 8:50:46 AM PDT
by
Hugin
(Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
To: SeekAndFind
All I know is I still can’t afford health insurance!
WOOOOOOO! YAY ME!
3
posted on
03/31/2017 8:51:19 AM PDT
by
chris37
(Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
To: SeekAndFind
“...the Freedom Caucus is ...insisting that they are willing to work with President Trump to keep the GOPs promise to repeal Obamacare.”
Nothing wrong with that.
4
posted on
03/31/2017 8:51:59 AM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Cats are like potato chips - you can't have just one.)
To: SeekAndFind
Way to come together there “R”s. All that effort to gain the White House and both houses and what do they do? Squanderville! Fidiots.
5
posted on
03/31/2017 8:53:33 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: SeekAndFind
I have no doubt that if a Freedom Caucus healthcare bill came to Trump’s desk he would sign it.
To: chris37
In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing. Theodore Roosevelt
Doing nothing is the Republican specialty.
7
posted on
03/31/2017 8:57:14 AM PDT
by
Hugin
(Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
To: SeekAndFind
[So did Rep. Labrador:
@realDonaldTrump Freedom Caucus stood with u when others ran. Remember who your real friends are. We’re trying to help u succeed. Raúl R. Labrador (@Raul_Labrador) March 30, 2017]
Wow... this is the biggest bunch of bulls—t I ever read!
Labrador was one of the more vocal anti-Trumpers the entire election!!
8
posted on
03/31/2017 9:00:24 AM PDT
by
ObozoMustGo2012
("Be quiet... you are #fakenews!")
To: SeekAndFind
Nothing personal here. If the HFC had the numbers - Trump would back them. But they don’t. They are just about 30 or so goobers with the Ryan RINO’s numbering about 200.
Them pesky little conservatives were easier to take out than Pelosi and the democrats. Score one victory for Team Trump.
(Don’t flame me. I’m just adding perspective.)
To: SeekAndFind
President Trump, if you’re absolutely confident in your outright attacks on the HFC, I dare you...I double dare you to hold a rally. Come on, put your money where your big mouth is! You’re going to be in for a little surprise!
10
posted on
03/31/2017 9:05:19 AM PDT
by
Artcore
To: SeekAndFind
Standing strong is now complaining on twitter. Not exactly the tar heels at Shiloh.
To: ObozoMustGo2012
Labrador was one of the more vocal anti-Trumpers the entire election!!
_____________________________________
I see this a lot. That the HFC were all Never Trumpers. And I say “So?”
Remember: ALL REPUBLICANS in DC were Never Trumpers. Especially RINO’s. And most especially Paul Ryan.
To: Responsibility2nd
Down to 28 goobers now, Poe quit and Ken Buck voted for AHCA and wrote an excellent article outlining why the rest of the FC should, too.
They will all be running for re-election in 2018. Maybe some of them are tired of being in Congress and will just consider this their last stand. But with the Democrats, the media, about 90% of their own party and the President against them, well what do you think their chances are?
13
posted on
03/31/2017 9:07:52 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: SeekAndFind
These guys are full of shit. I can’t stand the Arab back-stabber Amash. They go after Trump and Bannon but were happy to support the amnesty-pimping traitor Paul Ryan as Speaker. It figures the globalist creep Mark Levin’s site CR would be their whining HQ.
To: SeekAndFind
RE:”
These moderate Republicans refused to go along with a full repeal of Obamacare, and now they are pledging to work with liberal Democrats to pass bad bills rather than use the Republican majority to pass conservative legislation.
Its compromise with Democrats. Screw the conservatives. Pass liberal legislation that will hurt people. And President Trump is fine with all of it.” Its hard to imagine what kind of health care bill that both Republicans and Democrats would vote for.
“Repeal Obama-care” is itself a slap in Dems face.
Other stuff maybe they can get something.
The budget might be passed the same as always, some Rs and some Ds.
15
posted on
03/31/2017 9:08:05 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
(Trump declares war!)
To: SeekAndFind
Republicans doing what they always do, point the finger of blame. The ‘dirty secret’ is that the majority of Republicans do not oppose government run healthcare...
To: Just mythoughts
Yes and that’s why the freedom caucus shouldn’t fall into the Trap of letting nothing being done when some free-market reforms could be introduced into the system.
17
posted on
03/31/2017 9:10:18 AM PDT
by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: SeekAndFind
To: sergeantdave
Repeal. And repeal only.
The current two-sentence bill now being offered in the House would allow the reversion to the system as it existed in 2008.
Of course, this would have some of the more doctrinaire types in Congress up in arms, as they seem to think that “doing something” is better than “doing nothing”.
But fact is, except for a couple rough spots, the system of payments for medical services delivered as it existed in early 2009 was probably the most equable in the world, and it was kicked to pieces by the “modern” thinkers. The wrong solution was applied to a problem that up to then, was not a significant impediment to the culture of America, rather like amputating an arm to treat a hangnail.
19
posted on
03/31/2017 9:15:26 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(John Galt has chosen to take the job. This time, Atlas did NOT shrug.)
To: SeekAndFind
Can the freedom caucus stop being such little babies and help out with things like the Hillary-Russia connection? Give it some air time?
20
posted on
03/31/2017 9:17:01 AM PDT
by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson