Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That Was Then But This Is Now
vanity | March 30, 2017 | Nathan Bedford

Posted on 03/30/2017 4:45:10 AM PDT by nathanbedford

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201 next last
To: RummyChick

Stop putting words in my mouth. I said that Trump’s team has mentioned reading other conservative sites. For all I know, they’ve mentioned reading this one. All I’m asking for is to see that mention/cite.


141 posted on 03/30/2017 7:33:53 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
Uh huh....

3/30/2017, 10:00:54 AM · 125 of 141 Fantasywriter to RummyChick Trump himself did an AMA on r/The_Donald. If he or his staff was paying close enough attention to FR to be reading all the comments on the Trump-critical threads, we’d have heard about it.
142 posted on 03/30/2017 7:35:02 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

‘we’d have heard about it.’

Just because *I* haven’t heard of it doesn’t mean nobody else has. That’s why I asked: to get information. Try as you might to demonize it/me, it’s not criminal to ask for information.


143 posted on 03/30/2017 7:38:58 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

uh huh....
3/30/2017, 9:35:22 AM · 99 of 143
Fantasywriter to RummyChick
So you’re making an assumption. I was looking forward to seeing some facts and evidence.

There is proof, incidentally, that Trump’s close advisors read r/The_Donald. I’ve seen nothing similar re FR.


144 posted on 03/30/2017 7:40:34 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Bad call by ref. I did google it.


145 posted on 03/30/2017 7:40:36 AM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I don’t blame you one freaking bit!

I hope he clarifies his remarks quickly and narrows his criticism if not apologise outright. I staked my reputation on this man, and so did Coulter, and so did many others.


146 posted on 03/30/2017 7:44:13 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Progressive Trickle Up policy: reward cronies, punish everyone else. 'Stimulus' shell game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

“This is a post-election cycle, not a campaign cycle.”

I believe I may have to steal this because that one statement hits precisely what I feel is happening. A large segment here on FR have taken us completely away from our most obvious principled conservative beliefs by remaining in continual attack mode (aka campaign mode) vs. saying to themselves “what did he just say?”

What tips it off is when the immediate rebuttal to ANY argument is Cruz this or you must be a Cruzbot. When that has nothing to do with the content being discussed. In fact that is what Alinsky liberal radicals do. They deflect then attack the messenger. I’d rather they just come out and call me a tea bagger because at least I’ll then know where they are coming from. Not this pseudo conservatism


147 posted on 03/30/2017 7:45:30 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

When you resort to name-calling you lose by default.

That’s the traditional rule of this forum.


148 posted on 03/30/2017 7:45:51 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Progressive Trickle Up policy: reward cronies, punish everyone else. 'Stimulus' shell game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

So according to you, it’s a crime to want facts and evidence.

Put another way, assumptions trump facts and evidence, and you want to criminalize me for not acknowledging the superiority of assumptions over facts and evidence.


149 posted on 03/30/2017 7:47:34 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

I and others encouraged the GOP to entrust our fragile republic to him rather than to Cruz. Not only does Trump owe us, we are his only support base.


150 posted on 03/30/2017 7:48:44 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Progressive Trickle Up policy: reward cronies, punish everyone else. 'Stimulus' shell game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Point taken.


151 posted on 03/30/2017 7:51:32 AM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Is ‘golden snitch,’ a name?


152 posted on 03/30/2017 7:51:46 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

“I haven’t heard Cruz calling for Congressional investigations into Hillary’s crimes. Perhaps I missed it.”

Let’s stay in topic shall we? This isn’t about Cruz and it hasn’t been since Inauguration Day. I know some would like to deflect and topic of discomfort to the imagined boogeyman man but this is about President Trump, his statement of promises to his supporters and the continued backtracking from the promises he made.

This isn’t about Cruz, Paul, Lee or any other conservative. The man I voted for needs to put his big boy britches on and uphold to his promises. Not make his statements (as one poster said) based on the crowd reaction received.


153 posted on 03/30/2017 7:52:29 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

Talk to the person who introduced Cruz to the thread. I make no apologies for responding to someone else’s post.


154 posted on 03/30/2017 7:54:28 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

Whatever...you said we would have heard about it if they read this site..since no one can point you to concrete evidence...it must not be happening...because

well, they just aren’t smart enough to read FR

whatever...


155 posted on 03/30/2017 7:55:50 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

“IOW, it’s ok when Trump breaks his promises, major ones at that. He’s done some good things, no doubt, but this retreat on the border fence cuts at the heart of his campaign.”

I want to take point on this. If you mean by instilling once again a National sense of pride and uncovering what has already been known for decades by conservatives then yes I agree. If you mean overturning executive orders through his own executive orders as would be done as a matter of course and actually getting legislation pushed through against what he has promised then no he hasn’t been good at all.

This good thus far has been propagated as a visage with no actual true results. Sure a few thousand “promised” jobs here and there I’ll agree is some level of progress but not the millions that are needed. At this rate his policies thus far will net maybe 100,000 jobs by end of his first term


156 posted on 03/30/2017 7:59:24 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297
When did we lose that?

By the time Mister and Mrs. Trump got to the bottom of the escalator ride, many FReepers had lost their powers of discernment.


157 posted on 03/30/2017 8:02:39 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I’ve said I would be delighted to learn that Trump’s team reads and is influenced by this site. I’ve also said that just because I haven’t heard anything to indicate that they do doesn’t mean it’s not happening. I did, however, note that mentions have been made by Trump’s advisors of other conservative sites. I don’t know why they’d read this one, yet keep that fact a secret.

I remain unconvinced that *somebody* hasn’t heard FR mentioned by Trump or a close advisor. Surprise evidence may yet surface.


158 posted on 03/30/2017 8:03:19 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter; null and void

Oh dear.

I hope no one thinks I was insulting Rummy earlier.

The ‘Golden Snitch’ is a Quidditch term.

To catch the ‘Golden Snitch’ means you win 150 points and ‘game over’.


159 posted on 03/30/2017 8:03:22 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Progressive Trickle Up policy: reward cronies, punish everyone else. 'Stimulus' shell game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

LOLOL...I didn’t even catch that...I am just watching something bizarre on the thread..lolol


160 posted on 03/30/2017 8:05:23 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson