Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Senate Just Voted to Allow ISPs to Sell Your Data Without Asking
Inverse ^ | 03/23/17 | Monica Hunter-Hart

Posted on 03/23/2017 7:11:34 PM PDT by Enlightened1

The Senate overturned late Obama-era rules Thursday meant to protect consumer privacy from internet service providers that want to sell it.

The regulations were passed in October, but hadn’t yet gone into effect. They would have required ISPs like Comcast and Verizon to ask permission before using or selling personal information.

ISPs collect data like your browsing history, your physical location, the apps you’re using, and your financial and health information. They can then sell that data to advertisers, who use it to tailor their marketing to your individual wants and needs.

If customers don’t want their data to be used like this by ISPs, they can specifically notify the providers, who will have to oblige; this is known as an “opt out” policy. Last year Tom Wheeler, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) under Obama, wasn’t convinced that this standard did enough to protect consumers. He helped create the new set of rules, approved in October, requiring “opt in” policies. If the new regulations are allowed to take effect, ISPs will need to obtain your explicit approval before selling your data.

(Excerpt) Read more at inverse.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bloggers; clickbait; data; ips; sell; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Enlightened1; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...
;

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

If you aren't paying, you're the product...

...and if you ARE paying, you STILL might be the product!

21 posted on 03/23/2017 7:34:45 PM PDT by null and void (Drain the swamp! Get rid of the mosque-itoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

People seem to be woefully uninformed and also seem to think that commercial privacy is their new entitlement. But privacy is not an entitlement, it is guaranteed by adopting security. It cannot be guaranteed by regulatory government.


22 posted on 03/23/2017 7:35:08 PM PDT by palmer (turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They, and many retail firms, have been selling your private information for profit for quite some time.


23 posted on 03/23/2017 7:35:49 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

LOL

Soylant Green?


24 posted on 03/23/2017 7:37:56 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Bet it’s ours and Trump’s but not theirs or Hellary’s.


25 posted on 03/23/2017 7:39:34 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
scratchin my head. Where's the 4th violation here ?
26 posted on 03/23/2017 7:40:27 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I agree. More government regulation is not the answer

Astonishingly even on a conservative forum many are fooled by this spin and lies of the communists. Government is the problem not the answer .

Asking for government to protect your “privacy” with regulations is like asking doctors to cure a cold by injecting yourself with cancer cells or HIV cells


27 posted on 03/23/2017 7:41:30 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Yellen raising rates with only 1.8% growth to hurt Trump send USA to depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Once or ten times a day we should all search one finger salutes.


28 posted on 03/23/2017 7:41:35 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Your Right to Privacy.

Can Hospitals sell your medical records to whoever they want?

Answer: No it’s your privacy.

This is VERY BASIC, and not rocket science. Haha!


29 posted on 03/23/2017 7:44:12 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
I realize commenting without reading really is a common trait, but there is a difference; Obama & the FCC wanted ISPs to get your explicit permission (outside of the user agreement you agreed to when you first signed up with your ISP which, among many things, covered selling data...)to protect Google and Facebook’s market share as many ISPs (hey, AT&T) realized how they could bundle your viewing habits, your browsing habits, e-mail, financial information, etc. That was a more complete picture, and Google and Facebook wanted that quashed.

But hey, since it actually only removes a future regulation which no one is yet subject to and keeps things exactly as they are today, they're traitors, in your opinion.

30 posted on 03/23/2017 7:46:59 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

the bill of rights is a restriction on the government.
the 4th is a restriction on the Feds...where are the Feds in violation of the 4th here ?


31 posted on 03/23/2017 7:47:08 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Charlton Heston, Soylent Green
32 posted on 03/23/2017 7:49:52 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Exactly!

Great graphic BTW...

Funny. There’s always a cost...


33 posted on 03/23/2017 7:51:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (NeverTrump, a movement that was revealed to be a movement. Thank heaven we flushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

“The Senate overturned late Obama-era rules Thursday meant to protect consumer privacy from internet service providers that want to sell it. “

I agree with the Senate , yes overturn stupid Obama government regulations no matter how “consumer protective” this article says they were.


34 posted on 03/23/2017 7:52:44 PM PDT by Democrat_media (Yellen raising rates with only 1.8% growth to hurt Trump send USA to depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The ISPs want more subscribers, but in order to provide internet service to rural or low population areas and keep it affordable for those customers, they need to offset the costs with advertising revenue.

This will create two tiers: opt in for a lower price, opt out for a higher price.

The alternative is taxing everyone and using those funds to subsidize rural internet access, or everyone moves to cities.


35 posted on 03/23/2017 8:01:11 PM PDT by Read Write Repeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This is terrible and allows the government to legally buy your browse history data.


It allows advertisers to buy data~government already has it if what has been divulged by Snowden and others this week is true (I think it is.)

I am not familiar with this website, Inverse. Do you have any other sources?

Actually, someone told me about this legislation today, so I would like to know more.


36 posted on 03/23/2017 8:01:30 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

These spineless yobs just don’t seem to get it yet


37 posted on 03/23/2017 8:06:08 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

ALso, the website, Inverse, does not have any bill numbers or resolution information...Do you?


38 posted on 03/23/2017 8:10:39 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

39 posted on 03/23/2017 8:17:25 PM PDT by null and void (Drain the swamp! Get rid of the mosque-itoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: palmer

“If you are concerned about your privacy then sign up to opt out.”
==
That’s precisely the problem with this vote. What it reverses *is the option to opt-out*.


40 posted on 03/23/2017 8:17:47 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson